transfer in assignment

Difference Between Assignment and Transfer

The difference between assignment and transfer is that assign means it's legal to transfer property or a legal right from one person to another. 3 min read

The difference between assignment and transfer is that assign means it's legal to transfer property or a legal right from one person to another, while transfer means it's legal to arrange for something to be controlled by or officially belong to another person.

When used as verbs, assign means to set apart or designate something for a purpose while transfer means to pass or move from one person, place, or thing to someone or someplace else. When used as nouns, assign means the assignee and transfer is the act of removing or conveying something from one person, thing, or place to another. Transfer generally refers to titles whereas assignment is used with obligations and rights.

Definitions of Assignment and Transfer

• Assignment: Assignment is used in real estate law and contracts law. It covers the transfer of rights held by the assignor to the assignee.
• Transfer: To remove or convey from one person or place to someone or somewhere else.

Distinction Between Assignment and Transfer

When distinguishing between assignment and transfer, take licenses, for example. Licenses are contracts that don't allow legal action for infringement. They fall under state law. Therefore, state law will decide whether the license is an obligation or right that can be transferred or assigned legally.

One way to distinguish this example is that an individual contract under an agreement cannot be assigned, like entitlement to grant back royalties . In addition, the contract cannot be transferred. You need to break it down and figure out what the actual issue is — the parties' intent. An additional distinction is when the contract holder is an entity and the business owners want to transfer a portion or all of their stock. This can be seen as an implied transfer of the whole contract. However, it would not likely be an assignment of the rights covered under this agreement.

Difference Between Assign and License

The key difference between assign and license is that with a license, the person who grants permission, known as the licensor, keeps an interest in the product being licensed . In an assignment, the assignor will transfer his or her rights to the product or property being assigned.

Another difference is that assignments must be in writing and a license can be executed without being written. Consider, for example, intellectual property such as patents. Patents can be licensed verbally in some instances, but assignments for patents must be in writing and filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office .

Assignments grant the assignee full ownership of a product or property. Therefore, an assignment will typically cost more to acquire than a license.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are there ever situations in which a license can be transferred but is not assignable?

• Yes, in the case of allowing an assignment to one of your affiliates, the assignor would still be liable for the performance of the agreement under general assignment law. In this situation, you would not typically permit a transfer, because in a transfer, the person transferring would not maintain any obligations related to performance. Don't rely solely on this general understanding, but still expressly detail your agreement on what a licensee can legally do.

How will transfer and assignment rights affect someone's ability to sublicense?

• In theory, if a licensee has the authority to assign license rights to someone else, you could argue that it also provides the right to sublicense it. The issue here is that with a sublicense, the person sublicensing it keeps a license right, therefore effectively creating two licensees. With an assignment, only one right is assigned, and the assignee is the one who has possession of the license. With well-drafted licenses, the right to sublicense is not typically implied, as the licensor is the one who reserves all rights that are not expressly granted.

What is the effect of poorly drafted licenses?

• A poorly drafted license could result in giving someone implied rights to also sublicense. An example is a software license that allows a licensee to access the software without clarifying any restrictions or clearly defining the word “use.” This means that, depending on what this software is supposed to do, someone could think the term “use” means the licensee has permission to grant a sublicense as part of their usage rights.

If you need help understanding the difference between assignment and transfer, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel only accepts the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.

Hire the top business lawyers and save up to 60% on legal fees

Content Approved by UpCounsel

UpCounsel has successfully supported over 1585 clients in navigating Lawsuits & Disputes, connecting them with a network of 602 specialized Lawsuits & Disputes lawyers ready to assist you every day. With 557 client reviews, you can confidently find the right lawyer to meet your needs. Clients have consistently rated our lawyers highly for their expertise in Lawsuits & Disputes, reflecting a strong overall satisfaction score of 5.0.

• Assignment Law
• Legal Assignment
• Assignment Legal Definition
• Assignment Of Contracts
• Assignment of Rights and Obligations Under a Contract
• Partial Assignment of Contract
• Assignment of Rights Example
• What Is the Definition of Assigns
• Transfer of Intellectual Property
• Assignment of Contract Rights

JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. You must have JavaScript enabled in your browser to utilize the functionality of this website.

• Definitions
• Questions & Answers
• Articles/Guides
• Legal Topics
• Ask a Question
• Find Attorney
• Legal Forms
• Legal Guides
• Locate Lawyers
• Legal Research
• Submit Article
• Attorney Directory
• Privacy Policy

• USLegal Home
• Assignments
• Distinction Between Assignment And Other Transfers

Find a legal form in minutes

Browse US Legal Forms’ largest database of 85k state and industry-specific legal forms.

• Connecticut
• District of Columbia
• Massachusetts
• Mississippi
• New Hampshire
• North Carolina
• North Dakota
• Pennsylvania
• Rhode Island
• South Carolina
• South Dakota
• West Virginia
• Last Will and Testament
• Power of Attorney
• Promissory Note
• LLC Operating Agreement
• Living Will
• Rental Lease Agreement
• Non-Disclosure Agreement

An assignment is the transfer of a property right, title, or interest under an agreement to some particular person.[i]  However, in In re Ashford , 73 B.R. 37, 39 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1987) every transfer of interest is not an assignment.  It depends on the intention of the assignor.[ii]  Therefore an assignment is different from other types of transfers like a sublease, a novation, or a subrogation.

Although the difference between a novation and an assignment is relatively narrow, it is an essential one.[iii]  “Novation is a mechanism where one party transfers all its obligations and benefits under a contract to a third party.”[iv] In a novation, a third party successfully substitutes the original party as a party to the contract.  “When a contract is novated, the other contracting party must be left in the same position he was in prior to the novation being made.”  In an assignment, the parties to the contract do not change and privity of contract still exists between the original parties. The consent of the third party contracting is not necessary in an assignment . [v]

A sublease is the transfer when a tenant retains some right of reentry onto the leased premises.[vi]  However, if the tenant transfers the entire leasehold estate, retaining no right of reentry or other reversionary interest, then the transfer is an assignment.[vii]  Further, in a sublease, the original tenant is not released from the obligations of the original lease.  However, in an assignment, both the assignee as well as the original tenant, is bound by the covenants of the original lease.[viii]

Subrogation is the substitution of one person for another.[ix]  It is an equitable remedy where one person steps into the place of another and takes over the right to a claim for monetary damages to the extent that the other could have asserted it.[x]  In contrast, an assignment is a formal transfer of property or property rights.

[i] http://www.lectlaw.com/def/a080.htm

[ii] In re Ashford , 73 B.R. 37, 39 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1987)

[iii] http://www.netlawman.co.uk/info/novation-assignment.php

[vi] http://www.dallaslandlordlawyer.com/Sublease_and_Assignment.htm

[ix] http://www.answers.com/topic/subrogation

[x] Jones Cooling & Heating, Inc. v. Booth , 99 N.C. App. 757, 759 (N.C. Ct. App. 1990)

Inside Distinction Between Assignment And Other Transfers

Legal information.

• Personal Legal Forms
• Business Legal Forms
• FormsPass Subscriptions

For Consumer

• Information
• Attorney Assistance
• Partner with us

For Business

Customer support.

• 1-877-389-0141
• Terms of Service
• DMCA Policy
• Why USLegal?
• US Legal Forms
• airSlate workflows

AssignToday Blog

What is The Difference Between Assignment and Transfer

In real estate, sometimes contracts change hands after the deal is signed. But what does this mean?

AN ASSIGNMENT of a real estate contract means one of the original parties of the contract, (known as the Assignor) gives up all of their rights and responsibilities to another party (called the Assignee). The Assignor is usually the original Buyer of the property.

All obligations under the terms of the original contract revert to the Assignee when the sale transaction completes. The Assignor becomes the middleman, making a profit by selling the Assignment at a higher price than was contemplated in the original contract, or by receiving an Assignment Fee for completing the transaction.

A TRANSFER is the transfer of title (legal ownership) to the property. An Assignor can only assign the rights and responsibilities of the real estate contract, but cannot convey or transfer title of the property as they do not hold ownership of it prior to closing. The transfer would be completed on closing and would pass from the Seller to the Assignee.

Benefits Of An Assignment

• Assignors (the original purchaser) can sometimes make a quick profit by selling a Purchase Contract at a higher rate than what they were going to pay for the real estate property.
• The original purchaser can often negotiate to get their original deposit back from the Assignee. When the original purchaser entered into the purchase contract, they likely paid a deposit to the Seller. As part of the Assignment Agreement, the Assignee can be required to pay the deposit to the Assignor as consideration for the transaction.
• The Assignor avoids having to pay closing costs and property transfer tax since the Assignee, or new buyer will take that responsibility at closing.
• The Assignor relieves themselves of the obligations of the Purchase Contract without backing out of the deal with the Seller or Developer. Backing out of a Purchase Contract comes with certain difficulties since it’s a legally binding contract. There may be penalties due to the Developer if a buyer backs out or even lawsuits where the Developer tries to enforce the contract. Selling it as an Assignment, therefore, means the original buyer can avoid those potential expenses or liabilities.

As with any home purchase, it’s always a good idea to hire a real estate professional to assist you. Their professional experience can guide you to the right decision for your personal situation while avoiding any difficulties or unexpected hurdles.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Difference between Transfer and Assignment

19 Feb 2022  · 4 mins read

A single word may have more than one meanings. One might wonder how complex language is and how confusing words are. Transfer and assignment are such similar terms interchangeably used yet different in legal sense. The article discusses the meaning, types of assignment and how it is different from that of transfers.

In simple terms, assignment means the sale of IP i.e., the transfer of complete ownership to the assignee including the right to exclude others from infringing it. To constitute an assignment, the terms and conditions of contract under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The agreement must be signed and written. The specific IP laws determine the features of such assignment in detail. In Copyright law partial assignment is also permitted under section 18, which requires to mention specifically the rights assigned. Also, it is necessary to mention the time period for which the assignment is made. In the absence of such time period, generally 5 years is taken as a limit. Assigner is the owner who assigns it to another person known as assignee.

Assignment is different from that of licensing in a way that the latter only parts with certain rights and the ownership rests with the person who is ready to give away the rights.

The following are some of the common types of assignment:-

Legal Assignment- When the transfer of existing registered IP is transferred, wherein the new owner acquires all rights, it is known as legal assignment.

• Equitable Assignment- It occurs when before the registration, the assigner is willing to transfer it to the assignee. Once the registration is done the assignee can acquire all the rights. Although the assignee cannot register himself as the proprietor but can show interest in the IP through a notice.
• Mortgage- It is the total or partial transfer of IP in return of a sum of money. Once the money is repaid, the IP is reinstated to its original owner.

On the other hand, transfer means to convey or remove from one person or place to another person. Transfer is of titles whereas the Assignment is for obligations and rights. 1

The term transfer is generally used for properties that can be possessed physically. For example, a car or house or those properties which can be represented by a legal instrument such as share

certificate.

Assign is generally associated with intangible properties such as a debt, or benefits arising from contracts for example rental income under a lease agreement. 2

An assignment is thus different from other type of transfers such as subrogation, novation, sublease etc. Assignment is basically the transfer all rights, interests, titles which the assigner conveys to assignee and the latter stands in the shoes of the assigner. 3

Though the difference between novation and assignment is narrower, one ought to know the difference. “ Novation is a act whereby one party transfers all its obligations and benefits under a contract to a third party. ” 4

And for the transfer of the property, the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 applies. It extensively deals with various kinds of transfers. There are certain set rules for transfer of property. For instance, one needs to be of sound mind, not intoxicated, of legal age and must not be disqualified by law. The Act lists kinds of transfer such as lease, mortgage, exchange, gift and sale.

To sum up, though the words transfer and assignment is used interchangeably there is a difference between them. They are governed by different legislations and are used for different purposes. So one needs to be careful and understand all the legal provisions before transferring anything.

1 Difference between Assignment and transfer, UPCOUNSEL, (Nov 09, 2021, 5: 25 pm), https://www.upcounsel.com/difference-between-assignment-and-transfer . 2 Merchants Service Co. v. Small Claims Court, 35 Cal. 2d 109, 113-114 (Cal. 1950).. 3 Knott v. McDonald’s Corp., 985 F. Supp. 1222 (N.D. Cal. 1997). 4 Assignments: the basic law, STIMMEL LAW, (Nov 9, 2022, 5: 48 pm), https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/assignments-basic-law .

• 中文 ( Chinese (Simplified) )

Law.asia home

• Business law digest
• Deal Highlights
• Dispute digest
• Market pulse
• Practitioners’ perspectives
• Correspondents
• Intellectual Property
• Capital Market
• New Company Law

Transfer or assign?

A common – and often confusing – feature of English legal terminology is that two or more words are used to describe what appears to be the same noun, adjective or verb. So we see two or more words describing nouns, such as “goods and chattels” and “will and testament”; two or more words describing adjectives, such as “null and void”, “in full force and effect” and “fit and proper”; and two or more words describing actions, such as “give, devise and bequeath” and “sell, transfer and assign”.

Often referred to as synonym strings, this practice can be attributed to a couple of factors. The first factor is the subtle difference in the traditional legal meaning of words. For example, “will” was traditionally used in relation to real (or immovable) property, and “testament” was traditionally used in relation to personal (or movable) property. Along similar lines, “devise” was used in relation to the testamentary gift of real property and “bequeath” was used in relation to the testamentary gift of personal property.

In the context of modern contracts, many of these traditional legal distinctions are no longer relevant. For example, each of the words “representations” and “warranties” traditionally referred to different concepts and gave rise to different remedies. However, they still appear in contracts as a matter of convention, even where they refer to the same concept (see Lexicon in China Business Law Journal volume 1, issue 3, page 78, entitled Warranties and misrepresentations).

The second factor causing synonym strings is historical and linguistic in nature. After the Normans conquered England in 1066, Norman French or “law French” became the language of the law, together with Latin. The use of Latin and law French was subsequently prohibited by a statute in 1731, which introduced English as the language of the law and the courts.

Despite the adoption of English as the language of the law, many lawyers continued to use the French words alongside their English equivalents in contracts and other legal documents. For example, the English word “goods” was inserted in the phrase “goods and chattels” and the English word “give” was inserted in the phrase “give, devise and bequeath”.

In this column, we look at the use of the words “transfer” and “assign” in common law jurisdictions, and the equivalent terms in China. We will also look at the assignment of contractual rights under English law and PRC law.

In all common law jurisdictions, each of the words “transfer” and “assign” is commonly used to describe the act by which ownership of an asset is passed from one party to another. The asset might be a right or interest in relation to tangible property, such as a house or car, or a right or interest in relation to intangible property, such as a contractual right or claim.

Although the words are often used interchangeably, “transfer” has traditionally been used in connection with property that is capable of being physically possessed (e.g. a house or car) and property where ownership is represented by a legal instrument (e.g. a share certificate).

“Assign”, on the other hand, has traditionally been used in relation to intangible property rights, such as a debt or the benefits arising under a contract (e.g. the rental income under a lease agreement).

Assignment of debts, contractual rights under English law

From a public policy perspective, the transfer of an asset that is capable of being physically possessed is much less complicated than the assignment of an asset that consists of a claim or right under a contract.

This is because a tangible asset has a separate existence, which is not dependent on the acts or obligations of a third party. As long as the person in possession of the asset is also its owner and has clean title to the asset, no third parties will be adversely affected by the transfer.

In the case of the assignment of a debt or the benefits arising under a contract, however, the asset consists of a right to claim payment from a third party (i.e. the debtor or obligor).

The third party will be affected by the assignment, as it may be asked by the assignee to make payments to itself in place of the assignor. It will also be adversely affected if the assignment means that it loses the right to set off any payment obligations owing by the assignor against its own payment obligations.

Before the statutory development that occurred under the Judicature Act 1873, an assignment of a debt or contractual right was recognised in equity as an equitable assignment (see Lexicon in China Business Law Journal volume 3, issue 5, page 74, entitled Law or equity?).

Under an equitable assignment, the assignee could not enforce the debt or contractual right directly against the debtor or the obligor. However, it could require the assignor to sue the debtor or the obligor in the assignor’s name to recover payment on behalf of the assignee.

The Judicature Act (now section 136 of the Law of Property Act) introduced the concept of a legal assignment. Under a legal assignment, the assignee is able to step into the shoes of the assignor and claim payment directly from the debtor or the obligor if four conditions are satisfied: (1) the assignment is absolute (i.e. it is not part of a security arrangement); (2) the assignment is in writing; (3) the whole of the debt is assigned; and (4) written notice has been given to the debtor or the obligor. The relevant part of section 136 is set out below (note that a “legal thing in action” is a right that has no physical existence and can only be enforced through legal action).

第136条 据法财产的法定转让 (1) 转让人以书面形式作出并亲笔签署（其意并非只是以押记形式作出）的债权或其他据法财产的绝对转让，如果转让人已就该项绝对转让向该等债权或据法财产的债务人、受托人或其他义务人给予明确的书面通知，则该绝对转让具有法律效力并且自上述通知之日起向受让人转移和转让以下权利： (a) 该等债权或据法财产的法律权利； (b) 该等债权或据法财产的所有法律或其他救济措施； (c) 无须转让人的同意而直接确认债务人已妥为清偿该等债务或据法财产 … 136 Legal assignments of things in action. (1) Any absolute assignment by writing under the hand of the assignor (not purporting to be by way of charge only) of any debt or other legal thing in action, of which express notice in writing has been given to the debtor, trustee or other person from whom the assignor would have been entitled to claim such debt or thing in action, is effectual in law … to pass and transfer from the date of such notice: (a) the legal right to such debt or thing in action; (b) all legal and other remedies for the same; and (c) the power to give a good discharge for the same without the concurrence of the assignor …

The above section – and its equivalent in other common law jurisdictions – is one of the most important statutory provisions in commerce, as it underpins the trade in financial assets and supports many financial transactions, such as securitisation.

There is, however, a complex question that has not been conclusively answered in many common law jurisdictions: what is the legal position if the contract creating the debt prohibits an assignment by the creditor or provides that an assignment of the debt will not be effective without the consent of the debtor?

If a creditor assigns a debt in breach of a contractual prohibition, there are three possible outcomes:

• the assignment is wholly ineffective;
• the assignment is ineffective against the debtor but effective between the assignor and the assignee; or
• the assignment is wholly effective, both against the assignor and also the debtor (once written notice is given).

The question involves important issues of public policy, as it creates a conflict between two fundamental principles – namely, the principle of freedom of trade (under which the owners of financial assets should be able to sell them freely and without restriction) and the principle of freedom of contract (under which the parties to a contract should be free to determine their respective rights and obligations without undue interference from the law).

In England, the position is not settled.

The weight of legal opinion is in favour of treating the assignment as effective between the assignor and the assignee, but not between the assignee and the debtor. In the US, on the other hand, the law has decided in favour of freedom of trade by treating the assignment as fully effective. Article 9-138(4) of the Uniform Commercial Code provides that a term in any contract between a debtor and an assignor is ineffective if it prohibits the assignment of the debt or requires the debtor’s consent to an assignment.

As is the case in the English language, there are also several words in the Chinese language that describe the act by which tangible or intangible property rights are passed from one party to another.

These include “ 转让 ”, “ 转移 ” (or “ 移转 ” and “ 让与 ”). Some of the contexts in which these words are used are explained below.

“ 转让 ” and “ 转移 ” are often used interchangeably to refer to both the transfer of rights and the transfer of obligations from one party to another party.

See, for example, articles 84 and 88 of the PRC Contract Law, which respectively refer to the transfer of obligations and concurrent transfer of rights and obligations.

“ 转移 ” is often used to refer to the transfer of title. For example, article 130 of the PRC Contract Law provides that “a sales contract is a contract whereby the seller transfers title to the subject matter to the buyer, who pays the price”.

The term “ 让与 ” is often used to describe the assignment of contractual rights or the assignment of debts.

Assignment of debts or contractual rights under PRC law

Similar to article 136 of the Law of Property Act in England, articles 79 and 80 of the PRC Contract Law make provision for an assignment of contractual rights as follows:

第七十九条　 债权人可以将合同的权利全部或者部分转让给第三人，但有下列情形之一的除外： (一）根据合同性质不得转让； (二）按照当事人约定不得转让； (三）依照法律规定不得转让。 第八十条　 债权人转让权利的，应当通知债务人。未经通知，该转让对债务人不发生效力。 债权人转让权利的通知不得撤销，但经受让人同意的除外。 Article 79 An obligee may assign its rights under a contract in whole or in part to a third person, except in any of the following circumstances: (i) the rights are not capable of assignment in light of the nature of the contract; (ii) in accordance with the agreement between the parties, the rights may not be assigned; (iii) the law provides that the rights may not be assigned. Article 80 Where an obligee assigns its rights, it must notify the obligor. An assignment that is not notified is not binding upon the obligor. A notice of assignment of rights given by the obligee may not be revoked, except with the consent of the assignee.

Under article 79(ii), contractual rights may not be assigned if there is a prohibition against assignment in the contract. As a result, PRC law has taken the opposite position to the law in the US by providing that an assignment in breach of a contractual prohibition is wholly ineffective.

It will be interesting to see if PRC law becomes more flexible in the future and provides for a special set of rules in the case of commercial transactions.

If it does, it will be interesting to see whether it adopts a position similar to that in jurisdictions like England, where the assignment is effective between the assignor and the assignee, but not against the debtor, or a position similar to that in the US and France, where the assignment is wholly effective both against the assignor and the debtor (once written notice is given).

[/ihc-hide-content]

A former partner of Linklaters Shanghai, Andrew Godwin teaches law at Melbourne Law School in Australia, where he is an associate director of its Asian Law Centre. Andrew’s new book is a compilation of China Business Law Journal’s popular Lexicon series, entitled China Lexicon: Defining and translating legal terms. The book is published by Vantage Asia and available at law.asia.

RELATED ARTICLES MORE FROM AUTHOR

Using Chinese legal expert witnesses in international arbitration

Miura & Partners grows Asean work with Thai office

China In-House Impact Award 2024

Our editorial team presents the major projects, cases and deals that best showcase legal teams’ value, as well as our first Lifetime Achievement Awards

MOST POPULAR

The A-List 2023-24: Rising Stars

100 young elite lawyers for China market

China Deals of The Year 2023

From blockbuster issuances to fiercely contested disputes, we proudly unveil the Deals of the Year 2023

The A-List 2023-24: Growth Drivers

Leaders of seven leading arbitration institutions review their development highlights and explore future landscape

CORRESPONDENTS

Shareholders’ right to information under new Company Law

Saudi Arabia’s new gateway to global capital

Defining scope of bona fide counterparties under new Company Law

The A-List 2024-25: Visionaries

The A-List 2024-25 Legal leaders and influential lawyers in China's legal market

Resolving the blame game

The surge in equity disputes in China amid tough economic times has emphasised the importance of fast and effective resolutions

PRACTITIONERS' PERSPECTIVES

Navigating key aspects of international arbitration

Key points for civil affairs departments acting as estate administrators

Service by public notice

• Policy on advertising & sponsorship
• Terms & conditions of use
• Privacy Policy

Stay connected with us on LinkedIn

Deed of Assignment or Deed of Novation: Key Differences and Legal Implications of Novation and Assignment Contracts

• FACT-CHECKED

Introduction

Novation and assignment stand out as pivotal processes for the transfer of contractual rights and obligations. These legal concepts allow a party to the contract to adapt to changing circumstances, ensuring that business arrangements remain relevant and effective. This article explores the nuances of novation and assignment, shedding light on their distinct legal implications, procedures, and practical applications. Whether you’re a business owner navigating the transfer of service contracts, or an individual looking to understand your rights and responsibilities in a contractual relationship, or a key stakeholder in a construction contract, this guide will equip you with the essential knowledge to navigate these complex legal processes.

What is a Deed of Novation? 

Novation is a legal process that allows a new party to a contract to take the place of an original party in a contract, thereby transferring both the responsibilities and benefits under the contract to a third party. In common law, transferring contractual obligations through novation requires the agreement of all original parties involved in the contract, as well as the new party. This is because novation effectively terminates the original contract and establishes a new one.

A novation clause typically specifies that a contract cannot be novated without the written consent of the current parties. The inclusion of such a clause aims to preclude the possibility of novation based on verbal consent or inferred from the actions of a continuing party. Nevertheless, courts will assess the actual events that transpired, and a novation clause may not always be enforceable. It’s possible for a novation clause to allow for future novation by one party acting alone to a party of their choosing. Courts will enforce a novation carried out in this manner if it is sanctioned by the correct interpretation of the original contract.

Novation is frequently encountered in business and contract law, offering a means for parties to transfer their contractual rights and duties to another, which can be useful if the original party cannot meet their obligations or wishes to transfer their contract rights. For novation to occur, there must be unanimous consent for the substitution of the new party for the original one, necessitating a three-way agreement among the original party, the new party, and the remaining contract party. Moreover, the novation agreement must be documented in writing and signed by all involved parties. Understanding novation is essential in the realms of contracts and business dealings, as it provides a way for parties to delegate their contractual rights and responsibilities while freeing themselves from the original agreement.

Get legal advice you can rely on .

Contact us today.

What is a Deed of Assignment? 

A deed of assignment is a legal document that facilitates the transfer of a specific right or benefit from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee). This process allows the assignee to step into the assignor’s position, taking over both the rights and obligations under the original contract. In construction, this might occur when a main contractor assigns rights under a subcontract to the employer, allowing the employer to enforce specific subcontractor duties directly if the contractor fails.

Key aspects of an assignment include:

• Continuation of the Original Contract: The initial agreement remains valid and enforceable, despite the transfer of rights or benefits.
• Assumption of Rights and Obligations: The assignee assumes the role of the assignor, adopting all associated rights and responsibilities as outlined in the original contract.
• Requirement for Written Form: The assignment must be documented in writing, signed by the assignor, and officially communicated to the obligor (the party obligated under the contract).
• Subject to Terms and Law: The ability to assign rights or benefits is governed by the specific terms of the contract and relevant legal statutes.

At common law, parties generally have the right to assign their contractual rights without needing consent from the other party involved in the contract. However, this does not apply if the rights are inherently personal or if the contract includes an assignment clause that restricts or modifies this general right. Many contracts contain a provision requiring the consent of the other party for an assignment to occur, ensuring that rights are not transferred without the other party’s knowledge.

Once an assignment of rights is made, the assignee gains the right to benefit from the contract and can initiate legal proceedings to enforce these rights. This enforcement can be done either independently or alongside the assignor, depending on whether the assignment is legal or equitable. It’s important to note that while rights under the contract can be assigned, the contractual obligations or burdens cannot be transferred in this manner. Therefore, the assignor remains liable for any obligations under the contract that are not yet fulfilled at the time of the assignment.

Key Differences Between Novation and Assignment Deeds

Speak to a lawyer today ..

We respond within 24 hours.

Choosing Between Assignment and Novation in a Construction Contract

Choosing between a deed of novation and an assignment agreement depends on the specific circumstances and objectives of the parties involved in a contract. Both options serve to transfer rights and obligations but in fundamentally different ways, each with its own legal implications, risks, and benefits. Understanding these differences and considering various factors can help in making an informed decision that aligns with your goals.

Need a Deed of Novation or Assignment? Key Factors to Consider

The choice between assignment and novation in a construction project scenario, where, for instance, an employer wishes to engage a subcontractor directly due to loss of confidence in the main contractor, hinges on several factors. These are:

• Nature of the Contract:  The type of contract you’re dealing with (e.g., service, sales) can influence which option is more suitable. For instance, novation might be preferred for service contracts where obligations are personal and specific to the original parties.
• Parties Involved: Consent is a key factor. Novation requires the agreement of all original and new parties, making it a viable option only when such consent is attainable. Assignment might be more feasible if obtaining consent from all parties poses a challenge.
• Complexity of the Transaction: For transactions involving multiple parties and obligations, novation could be more appropriate as it ensures a clean transfer of all rights and obligations. Assignment might leave the original party with ongoing responsibilities.
• Time and Cost: Consider the practical aspects, such as the time and financial cost associated with each option. Novation typically involves more complex legal processes and might be more time-consuming and costly than an assignment.

If the intention is merely to transfer the rights of the subcontractor’s work to the employer without altering the subcontractor’s obligations under a contract, an assignment might suffice. However, if the goal is to completely transfer the main contractor’s contractual role and obligations to the employer or another entity, novation would be necessary, ensuring that all parties consent to this new arrangement and the original contractor is released from their obligations.

The legal interpretations and court decisions highlight the importance of the document’s substance over its label. Even if a document is titled a “Deed of Assignment,” it could function as a novation if it transfers obligations and responsibilities and involves the consent of all parties. The key is to clearly understand and define the objective behind changing the contractual relationships and to use a deed — assignment or novation — that best achieves the desired legal and practical outcomes, ensuring the continuity and successful completion of the construction project.

Selecting the Right Assignment Clause for Your Contract – Helping You Make the Right Choice

Understanding the distinction between assignment deeds and novation deeds is crucial for anyone involved in contractual agreements. Novation offers a clean slate by transferring both rights and obligations to a new party, requiring the consent of all involved. Assignment, conversely, allows for the transfer of contractual benefits without altering the original contract’s obligations. Each method serves different strategic purposes, from simplifying transitions to preserving original contractual duties. The choice between novation and assignment hinges on specific legal, financial, and practical considerations unique to each situation. At PBL Law Group, we specialise in providing comprehensive legal advice and support in contract law. Our team is dedicated to helping clients understand their options and make informed decisions that align with their legal and business objectives. Let’s discuss!

• X (Twitter)

Authored By Raea Khan

Director Lawyer, PBL Law Group

Find what you need

Share this article, book a 15-min consultation​, rated 5-star by our clients, latest insights & practical guides.

Family Limited Partnership (FLP) for International Estate Planning

Family Limited Partnerships (FLPs) offer a strategic approach for families

What Books and Records Does an Owners Corporation Need to Keep?

Anyone who has run a business, been on a board

Understanding Superannuation in International Estate Planning: A Comprehensive Guide to Australian Superannuation and Foreign Superannuation Funds

Superannuation is a crucial component of estate planning for Australian

Speak to us Now or Request a Consultation.

How can our expert lawyers help.

Property and strata disputes, building defects claims, setting up new Owners Corporations and more…

Construction & Building Law

Construction and building disputes, building defects, delays and claims, debt recovery and more…

International Estate Planning

Cross-border estate planning, international wills and trusts, tax-efficient wealth transfer strategies and more…

Commercial & Business Law

Starting and scaling your business, banking and business financing, bankruptcy and insolvency and more…

Planning & Environment Law

Environment and planning regulation, land and environment court disputes, sub-divisions and more…

Wills & Estates

Creating, updating and contesting wills, estate planning and administration, probate applications and more…

Get In Touch

Helpful links, site information, how we can help.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Copyright © 2024 PBL Law Group. All Rights Reserved

Built by Commersion.Legal

Thank You For Your Request.

We’ve received your consultation request and will contact you within the next 24 hours (excluding weekends).

• More Networks

Legal Implications of Contract Assignments

Contract assignments, whether by operation of law or voluntary agreement, trigger a complex array of legal implications that can substantially alter the rights, obligations, and liabilities of all parties involved. Novation and assignment differ in that novation extinguishes the original contract, while assignment transfers specific rights or obligations. The effects of assignment include the transfer of liabilities, changes to contractual relationships, and potential disputes. It is vital to examine the contract terms, applicable laws, and intent of the parties to determine the extent of the assignment. Understanding these complexities is imperative to navigate the intricate landscape of contract assignments, and further exploration reveals the nuanced details.

Table of Contents

Assignment by Operation of Law

In certain circumstances, a contract assignment can occur automatically, without the need for explicit consent or agreement, through a process known as assignment by operation of law. This type of assignment arises from the application of statutory provisions or court orders, rather than from the voluntary acts of the parties involved. For instance, in bankruptcy proceedings, the trustee in bankruptcy may assume control over the debtor's contracts, effectively assigning them to the trustee without the need for the debtor's consent. Similarly, statutory transfers, such as those arising from mergers and acquisitions, can also lead to the automatic assignment of contracts. In these scenarios, the assignment is deemed to have occurred by operation of law, and the parties are bound by the terms of the contract as if they had voluntarily agreed to the assignment. This type of assignment can have significant legal implications, and it is crucial for parties to understand the circumstances under which it can occur and the consequences that follow.

Novation Vs. Assignment

In the context of contract assignments, novation and assignment are two distinct concepts that are often confused. While both involve the transfer of contractual rights and obligations, they differ fundamentally in their nature and effects. This section will clarify the definitions of novation and assignment, highlighting their key differences and the implications for contractual obligations.

Definition of Novation

A novation, a tripartite agreement that substitutes a new party for one of the original parties to a contract, differs substantially from an assignment, which involves the transfer of a party's rights or obligations to a third party. Fundamentally, novation alters the contract's fundamental nature by replacing one of the original parties, whereas assignment only transfers specific rights or obligations. This distinction has significant implications for contract management and dispute resolution.

The benefits of novation include:

• Clarity and certainty : Novation provides a clear and explicit agreement among all parties, eliminating ambiguity and certifying that all parties comprehend their responsibilities and obligations.
• Fresh start : Novation offers a clean slate, allowing parties to start anew and move forward without the burden of past disputes or issues.
• Flexibility : Novation enables parties to adapt to changing circumstances and renegotiate terms to better suit their needs.
• Legal finality : Novation provides legal finality, establishing that all parties are bound by the new agreement and that previous obligations are discharged.

Assignment Key Differences

Assignment Key Differences (Novation Vs. Assignment)

While novation involves a tripartite agreement that substitutes a new party for one of the original parties, assignment merely transfers specific rights or obligations to a third party, highlighting fundamental differences in the contractual relationships and obligations of the parties involved. This distinction is vital, as it determines the contract priority and legal ramifications of each transaction. In assignment, the original contract remains intact, with the assignee stepping into the shoes of the assignor, whereas in novation, the original contract is extinguished, and a new contract is formed. This difference in contractual relationships affects the obligations and liabilities of the parties, with novation typically involving a more thorough transfer of rights and obligations. Understanding these key differences is imperative to navigate the complex landscape of contract assignments, facilitating that parties are aware of their rights and obligations under the contract.

Effect on Obligations

The contractual obligations of the parties involved undergo a significant transformation in both novation and assignment, albeit with distinct implications for the assignee, obligor, and assignor.

In novation, the original contract is effectively terminated, and a new contract is formed between the remaining parties. This leads to an obligation transfer, where the assignee assumes the original obligations, and the assignor is released from liability.

In contrast, assignment does not terminate the original contract. Instead, the assignee assumes the rights and obligations of the assignor, but the assignor remains liable for any breaches.

The key differences in the effect on obligations between novation and assignment can be summarized as follows:

• Novation releases the assignor from liability, while assignment does not.
• Novation involves a new contract, whereas assignment involves the transfer of rights and obligations under the original contract.
• In novation, the obligor's consent is typically required, whereas in assignment, consent may not be necessary.
• Novation leads to a complete liability shift, whereas assignment involves a shared liability between the assignor and assignee.

Note: The modified text replaces the words "result" and "results" with "leads" and "lead" respectively, to maintain contextual relevance.

Rights and Obligations Transfer

Contractual rights and obligations are inherently tied to the assignor and assignee, and their transfer requires careful consideration to avoid ambiguity and potential disputes. In the context of contract assignments, the transfer of rights and obligations is a critical aspect that merits attention.

A key concept in this regard is contractual privity, which refers to the direct relationship between the original contracting parties. When a contract is assigned, the question arises as to whether the assignee steps into the shoes of the assignor, assuming all the rights and obligations. A transferability analysis is necessary to determine the extent to which the assignee takes on the obligations and enjoys the rights of the assignor. This analysis involves examining the contract terms, applicable laws, and the intent of the parties involved. A thorough transferability analysis helps to clarify the rights and obligations of the assignee, facilitating a smooth handover and minimizing the risk of disputes. By carefully evaluating the transfer of rights and obligations, parties can facilitate a seamless succession and maintain the integrity of the original contract.

Consent and Notification Rules

Vital consent and timely notification are crucial prerequisites for a valid contract assignment, as they safeguard the interests of all parties involved and prevent potential disputes. The consent requirement ensures that the parties are aware of and agree to the assignment, while notification rules guarantee that all parties are informed of the changes.

The consent and notification rules can be categorized into the following:

• Silent Consent : Implied consent, where the obligor's (party owing the obligation) silence or inaction is deemed as consent to the assignment.
• Explicit Waivers : Written waivers, where the obligor explicitly agrees to the assignment, releasing the assignor from their obligations.
• Contractual Requirements : Specific provisions in the original contract that outline the consent and notification procedures for assignment.
• Statutory Requirements : Laws and regulations that govern the consent and notification rules for contract assignments in a particular jurisdiction.

Impact on Contractual Relationships

When a contract is assigned, the contractual relationships between the original parties and the assignee undergo significant changes. The obligations of the parties shift, as the assignee assumes the rights and duties of the assignor. This alteration in party obligations can have far-reaching consequences, affecting the performance and enforcement of the contract.

Party Obligations Shift

Upon assignment, the obligations of the original parties to the contract are transferred to the assignee, effectively altering the dynamics of the contractual relationship. This shift in obligations can have significant implications for the parties involved, as it redistributes the contract risks and performance burden.

The assignee assumes the responsibilities and liabilities of the original party, including any outstanding obligations or debts. This can lead to:

• Increased exposure to contract risks, such as non-performance or breach of contract
• A heightened performance burden, as the assignee must fulfill the original party's obligations
• Changes to the original party's rights and duties under the contract
• Potential disputes or conflicts arising from the transfer of obligations

The shift in party obligations can also impact the contractual relationship, potentially leading to changes in the dynamics of trust, communication, and cooperation between the parties. It is essential for parties to carefully consider the implications of assignment and ensure that the terms of the contract are clear and comprehensive to avoid potential disputes or conflicts.

Rights and Duties

The assignment of a contract can substantially alter the allocation of rights and duties among the parties, potentially leading to a redefinition of their contractual relationships. This shift can have significant implications for the contractual boundaries, as the assignee may assume new rights and obligations that were previously held by the assignor. In particular, fiduciary obligations, such as duties of care and loyalty, may be transferred to the assignee, creating new responsibilities and liabilities.

The redefinition of contractual relationships can also lead to changes in the allocation of risk and liability among the parties. The assignee may assume new risks and liabilities, while the assignor may be released from certain obligations. This can have significant consequences for the parties' contractual expectations and may require adjustments to their contractual strategies. Furthermore, the assignment of a contract can also impact the contractual relationships between the parties and third parties, such as subcontractors or suppliers. A thorough understanding of the legal implications of contract assignments is essential to navigate these complex issues and ensure that the parties' rights and duties are properly allocated.

Dispute Resolution and Litigation

In the event of a contractual dispute arising from an assignment, parties may seek resolution through various means, including arbitration, mediation, or litigation . The chosen method of dispute resolution will substantially impact the outcome of the case.

In cases where litigation is pursued, court jurisdiction becomes a vital factor. The courts will need to determine whether they have jurisdiction over the matter, taking into account the assignment agreement and the parties involved.

Some assignment agreements may include arbitration clauses, which can affect the dispute resolution process. These clauses can dictate the forum for dispute resolution, the rules of procedure, and the powers of the arbitrator.

• The terms of the assignment agreement can influence the choice of dispute resolution method
• The jurisdiction of the court may be determined by the terms of the assignment agreement
• Arbitration clauses can limit the scope of judicial review
• The parties' rights and obligations under the assignment agreement can impact the dispute resolution process

Avoiding Unintended Consequences

Contractual disputes and litigation can be costly and time-consuming, making it imperative for parties to carefully consider the terms of an assignment agreement to avoid unintended consequences that may arise from misunderstandings or ambiguities. To mitigate these risks, a thorough examination is crucial to identify potential pitfalls and zones of uncertainty. This involves a detailed review of the contract, concentrating on key provisions such as assignment clauses, warranties, and indemnities. A meticulous contract review can help parties understand their rights and obligations, verifying that the assignment agreement accurately reflects their intentions. In addition, a well-drafted agreement can prevent disputes by providing clear and unambiguous terms, thereby reducing the likelihood of litigation. By conducting a thorough examination and contract review, parties can avoid unintended consequences and guarantee a smooth transfer of rights and obligations. This proactive approach can save time, resources, and reputational damage, ultimately facilitating a successful contract assignment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can contractual rights be assigned to multiple parties simultaneously?.

Contractual rights can be assigned to multiple parties simultaneously, creating joint ownership or conferring benefits on multiple beneficiaries, but this may lead to complexities in rights management, benefit distribution, and potential disputes among assignees.

Do Contractual Obligations Transfer Automatically Upon Assignment?

Upon assignment, contractual obligations do not automatically transfer; instead, novation requirements must be fulfilled, and successor liability may apply, thereby guaranteeing the assignee assumes the obligations and the assignor is released from liability.

Is an Assignment Agreement a Separate Contract From the Original?

An assignment agreement constitutes a separate contract from the original, establishing a new contractual relationship between assignor and assignee, thereby creating a contract hierarchy, where the assignment agreement legally merges with the original contract.

Can a Contractual Party Assign Their Rights Without the Other Party's Knowledge?

In general, a contractual party can assign their rights without the other party's knowledge if the original contract remains silent on the matter, implying silent consent, allowing for unilateral decisions regarding assignment.

Does an Assignment Void the Original Contract Between the Parties?

An assignment does not automatically void the original contract between parties, but it may trigger novation requirements or contract termination clauses, depending on the specific terms and conditions outlined in the agreement.

UNLOCK YOUR COPY

Home » LLC Interest Transfer » Assignment and Transfer of Membership Interest

Assignment and Transfer of Membership Interest

Jeramie Fortenberry, J.D., LL.M.

An LLC owner (called a member ) can transfer an ownership interest (called a membership interest ) by complying with the transfer provisions within the LLC’s operating agreement and state law. An assignment is one of the key documents a member must prepare to officially transfer a membership interest to a transferee.

What is the Purpose of an LLC Interest Assignment?

An assignment—sometimes titled assignment and transfer or assignment and assumption —serves as a written record of a member’s transfer of an LLC interest to a transferee. It is comparable to a deed that transfers real estate, but an assignment instead transfers to a new owner (the assignee or transferee ) some or all of an LLC member’s ownership rights in the company. Like some deeds, an assignment may include the member’s guarantee that he or she actually owns the interest being transferred and has the right to transfer it.

An LLC interest assignment must comply with any transfer terms, conditions, or restrictions in the company’s operating agreement. For example, an operating agreement may require other members’ consent to the transfer or limit the ownership rights that members are allowed to transfer.

An LLC owner may also prepare an assignment when offering an ownership interest as security for a loan. In that situation, the lender is the assignee and usually claims the interest only if the member fails to repay the loan. Assignments of LLC interests pledged as collateral are subject to additional laws and are not the focus of this article.

What LLC Interests Do Assignments Transfer?

A member who creates an LLC assignment customizes the assignment to the precise ownership interest the member wishes to transfer. LLC ownership interests can generally be separated into two basic interests:

• Economic rights. A member’s economic rights (sometimes called transferable interest ) include the member’s allocation of the LLC’s profits and losses and the member’s right to receive distributions from the company.
• Membership rights. A member’s membership rights—which are typically defined in the operating agreement—include the member’s right to vote on important matters, participate in the LLC’s internal affairs, and join in the management of the company (if it is member-managed).

An assignment can transfer the member’s economic rights (in whole or in part)—in which case the transferee receives a right to LLC distributions but no right to vote on LLC matters. Or, an assignment can transfer the member’s entire interest in the company. A transfer of all membership rights typically requires other members’ approval, formal admittance of the transferee as a new member, and a separate joinder agreement under which the new member accepts the LLC’s operating agreement.

What Information is Included in an LLC Membership Assignment?

An assignment must identify the transferor and the transferee, the company, and the specific interest being transferred. It should state whether the transfer applies to all or part of the transferor’s interest and whether the transferee will receive all membership rights or an economic interest only.

Assignments often also include:

• A reference to the operating agreement’s authorization of the transfer;
• A statement that the transfer has been approved under the operating agreement’s approval standard; and
• The transferor’s warranty that he or she actually owns the interest and that the assignment does not breach any other agreements.

An assignment must be signed by the member who makes the transfer and—depending on its terms—may also be signed by the transferee and on behalf of the LLC.