how to critique research articles

How to Write an Article Critique Step-by-Step

Table of contents

• 1 What is an Article Critique Writing?
• 2 How to Critique an Article: The Main Steps
• 3 Article Critique Outline
• 4 Article Critique Formatting
• 5 How to Write a Journal Article Critique
• 6 How to Write a Research Article Critique
• 7 Research Methods in Article Critique Writing
• 8 Tips for writing an Article Critique

Do you know how to critique an article? If not, don’t worry – this guide will walk you through the writing process step-by-step. First, we’ll discuss what a research article critique is and its importance. Then, we’ll outline the key points to consider when critiquing a scientific article. Finally, we’ll provide a step-by-step guide on how to write an article critique including introduction, body and summary. Read more to get the main idea of crafting a critique paper.

What is an Article Critique Writing?

An article critique is a formal analysis and evaluation of a piece of writing. It is often written in response to a particular text but can also be a response to a book, a movie, or any other form of writing. There are many different types of review articles . Before writing an article critique, you should have an idea about each of them.

To start writing a good critique, you must first read the article thoroughly and examine and make sure you understand the article’s purpose. Then, you should outline the article’s key points and discuss how well they are presented. Next, you should offer your comments and opinions on the article, discussing whether you agree or disagree with the author’s points and subject. Finally, concluding your critique with a brief summary of your thoughts on the article would be best. Ensure that the general audience understands your perspective on the piece.

How to Critique an Article: The Main Steps

If you are wondering “what is included in an article critique,” the answer is:

An article critique typically includes the following:

• A brief summary of the article .
• A critical evaluation of the article’s strengths and weaknesses.
• A conclusion.

When critiquing an article, it is essential to critically read the piece and consider the author’s purpose and research strategies that the author chose. Next, provide a brief summary of the text, highlighting the author’s main points and ideas. Critique an article using formal language and relevant literature in the body paragraphs. Finally, describe the thesis statement, main idea, and author’s interpretations in your language using specific examples from the article. It is also vital to discuss the statistical methods used and whether they are appropriate for the research question. Make notes of the points you think need to be discussed, and also do a literature review from where the author ground their research. Offer your perspective on the article and whether it is well-written. Finally, provide background information on the topic if necessary.

When you are reading an article, it is vital to take notes and critique the text to understand it fully and to be able to use the information in it. Here are the main steps for critiquing an article:

• Read the piece thoroughly, taking notes as you go. Ensure you understand the main points and the author’s argument.
• Take a look at the author’s perspective. Is it powerful? Does it back up the author’s point of view?
• Carefully examine the article’s tone. Is it biased? Are you being persuaded by the author in any way?
• Look at the structure. Is it well organized? Does it make sense?
• Consider the writing style. Is it clear? Is it well-written?
• Evaluate the sources the author uses. Are they credible?
• Think about your own opinion. With what do you concur or disagree? Why?

Article Critique Outline

When assigned an article critique, your instructor asks you to read and analyze it and provide feedback. A specific format is typically followed when writing an article critique.

An article critique usually has three sections: an introduction, a body, and a conclusion.

• The introduction of your article critique should have a summary and key points.
• The critique’s main body should thoroughly evaluate the piece, highlighting its strengths and weaknesses, and state your ideas and opinions with supporting evidence.
• The conclusion should restate your research and describe your opinion.

You should provide your analysis rather than simply agreeing or disagreeing with the author. When writing an article review , it is essential to be objective and critical. Describe your perspective on the subject and create an article review summary. Be sure to use proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation, write it in the third person, and cite your sources.

Article Critique Formatting

When writing an article critique, you should follow a few formatting guidelines. The importance of using a proper format is to make your review clear and easy to read.

Make sure to use double spacing throughout your critique. It will make it easy to understand and read for your instructor.

Indent each new paragraph. It will help to separate your critique into different sections visually.

Use headings to organize your critique. Your introduction, body, and conclusion should stand out. It will make it easy for your instructor to follow your thoughts.

Use standard fonts, such as Times New Roman or Arial. It will make your critique easy to read.

Use 12-point font size. It will ensure that your critique is easy to read.

How to Write a Journal Article Critique

When critiquing a journal article, there are a few key points to keep in mind:

• Good critiques should be objective, meaning that the author’s ideas and arguments should be evaluated without personal bias.
• Critiques should be critical, meaning that all aspects of the article should be examined, including the author’s introduction, main ideas, and discussion.
• Critiques should be informative, providing the reader with a clear understanding of the article’s strengths and weaknesses.

When critiquing a research article, evaluating the author’s argument and the evidence they present is important. The author should state their thesis or the main point in the introductory paragraph. You should explain the article’s main ideas and evaluate the evidence critically. In the discussion section, the author should explain the implications of their findings and suggest future research.

It is also essential to keep a critical eye when reading scientific articles. In order to be credible, the scientific article must be based on evidence and previous literature. The author’s argument should be well-supported by data and logical reasoning.

How to Write a Research Article Critique

When you are assigned a research article, the first thing you need to do is read the piece carefully. Make sure you understand the subject matter and the author’s chosen approach. Next, you need to assess the importance of the author’s work. What are the key findings, and how do they contribute to the field of research?

Finally, you need to provide a critical point-by-point analysis of the article. This should include discussing the research questions, the main findings, and the overall impression of the scientific piece. In conclusion, you should state whether the text is good or bad. Read more to get an idea about curating a research article critique. But if you are not confident, you can ask “ write my papers ” and hire a professional to craft a critique paper for you. Explore your options online and get high-quality work quickly.

However, test yourself and use the following tips to write a research article critique that is clear, concise, and properly formatted.

• Take notes while you read the text in its entirety. Right down each point you agree and disagree with.
• Write a thesis statement that concisely and clearly outlines the main points.
• Write a paragraph that introduces the article and provides context for the critique.
• Write a paragraph for each of the following points, summarizing the main points and providing your own analysis:
• The purpose of the study
• The research question or questions
• The methods used
• The outcomes
• The conclusions were drawn by the author(s)
• Mention the strengths and weaknesses of the piece in a separate paragraph.
• Write a conclusion that summarizes your thoughts about the article.
• Free unlimited checks
• All common file formats
• Accurate results
• Intuitive interface

Research Methods in Article Critique Writing

When writing an article critique, it is important to use research methods to support your arguments. There are a variety of research methods that you can use, and each has its strengths and weaknesses. In this text, we will discuss four of the most common research methods used in article critique writing: quantitative research, qualitative research, systematic reviews, and meta-analysis.

Quantitative research is a research method that uses numbers and statistics to analyze data. This type of research is used to test hypotheses or measure a treatment’s effects. Quantitative research is normally considered more reliable than qualitative research because it considers a large amount of information. But, it might be difficult to find enough data to complete it properly.

Qualitative research is a research method that uses words and interviews to analyze data. This type of research is used to understand people’s thoughts and feelings. Qualitative research is usually more reliable than quantitative research because it is less likely to be biased. Though it is more expensive and tedious.

Systematic reviews are a type of research that uses a set of rules to search for and analyze studies on a particular topic. Some think that systematic reviews are more reliable than other research methods because they use a rigorous process to find and analyze studies. However, they can be pricy and long to carry out.

Meta-analysis is a type of research that combines several studies’ results to understand a treatment’s overall effect better. Meta-analysis is generally considered one of the most reliable type of research because it uses data from several approved studies. Conversely, it involves a long and costly process.

Are you still struggling to understand the critique of an article concept? You can contact an online review writing service to get help from skilled writers. You can get custom, and unique article reviews easily.

Tips for writing an Article Critique

It’s crucial to keep in mind that you’re not just sharing your opinion of the content when you write an article critique. Instead, you are providing a critical analysis, looking at its strengths and weaknesses. In order to write a compelling critique, you should follow these tips: Take note carefully of the essential elements as you read it.

• Make sure that you understand the thesis statement.
• Write down your thoughts, including strengths and weaknesses.
• Use evidence from to support your points.
• Create a clear and concise critique, making sure to avoid giving your opinion.

It is important to be clear and concise when creating an article critique. You should avoid giving your opinion and instead focus on providing a critical analysis. You should also use evidence from the article to support your points.

Readers also enjoyed

WHY WAIT? PLACE AN ORDER RIGHT NOW!

Just fill out the form, press the button, and have no worries!

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.

Article Critique

Ai generator.

In the realm of academia and intellectual discourse, the art of critiquing articles holds significant importance. It not only refines one’s skills but also contributes to the growth of knowledge. A well-executed article critique showcases your ability to analyze, evaluate, and engage with scholarly work. This article delves into the concept of article critiques, offering insights into their purpose and benefits, along with a step-by-step guide on how to craft one effectively.

What is an Article Critique?

An article critique is a detailed evaluation and analysis of a scholarly article or research paper . It involves an objective assessment of the author’s arguments, evidence, methodology, and conclusions. An effective critique goes beyond summarizing the content; it delves into the strengths, weaknesses, and implications of the article. Developing this skill allows you to identify the characteristics that contribute to a compelling scholarly work, while also honing your ability to engage critically with academic literature.

Article Critique Format

1. introduction.

• Article Information : Mention the title of the article, the author’s name, the source ( journal , magazine , etc.), and the publication date.
• Thesis Statement : Summarize the main argument or purpose of the article.
• Scope of the Critique : Briefly outline the main points you will discuss in your critique.

2. Summary of the Article

• Main Points : Summarize the key points and arguments presented by the author.
• Purpose and Scope : Explain the purpose of the article and the main topics covered.
• Findings and Conclusions : Highlight the primary findings and conclusions drawn by the author.

3. Critical Analysis

A. structure and organization.

• Introduction : Evaluate the effectiveness of the introduction. Does it set the stage for the article?
• Body : Assess the organization of the main sections. Are the arguments and evidence presented logically?
• Conclusion : Examine the conclusion. Does it effectively summarize the article and provide closure?

b. Content and Arguments

• Clarity : Determine if the article is clear and easy to understand.
• Evidence : Analyze the evidence used to support the arguments. Is it relevant and convincing?
• Consistency : Check for logical consistency in the arguments.

c. Research Methodology

• Approach : Evaluate the research methods used in the article. Are they appropriate for the research question ?
• Data Collection : Assess the reliability and validity of the data collection methods.
• Analysis : Examine the thoroughness and accuracy of the data analysis .

d. Writing Style

• Tone : Assess the appropriateness of the tone for the target audience.
• Language : Evaluate the use of language. Is it precise and concise?
• Grammar and Syntax : Check for grammatical correctness and syntactical clarity.

e. Contribution to the Field

• Originality : Determine the originality of the article. Does it offer new insights?
• Impact : Assess the potential impact of the article on the field. Does it advance knowledge or understanding?

4. Personal Response

• Strengths : Identify the strengths of the article. What did the author do well?
• Weaknesses : Point out the weaknesses or areas for improvement.
• Overall Impression : Provide your overall impression of the article.

5. Conclusion

• Summary : Summarize your main points of critique.
• Recommendation : Offer any recommendations for future research or improvements to the article.

6. References

• Citation : Provide a full citation of the article in the appropriate format (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).
• Additional Sources : Include citations for any additional sources referenced in your critique.

Examples of Article Critique For Students

Psychology article critique.

Reference: Smith, J. A., & Brown, R. L. (2022). The impact of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance. Journal of Psychological Research , 34(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1001/jpsychres.2022.01.001 Introduction In their article “The Impact of Sleep Deprivation on Cognitive Performance,” Smith and Brown (2022) examine the effects of sleep deprivation on various cognitive functions. The authors aim to highlight the importance of adequate sleep for maintaining cognitive health and performance. Summary Smith and Brown (2022) conducted a series of cognitive tests on participants who were sleep-deprived for 24 hours. The results indicated significant declines in memory retention, attention span, and problem-solving skills among the sleep-deprived group. The article also discusses potential long-term consequences of chronic sleep deprivation on brain health. Critique Smith and Brown (2022) provide compelling evidence linking sleep deprivation to cognitive decline. Their methodology is robust, featuring a well-defined participant group and controlled variables. However, the study’s sample size is relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the article does not sufficiently explore potential confounding factors, such as stress and caffeine intake, which could influence cognitive performance. Conclusion Overall, Smith and Brown (2022) effectively underscore the critical role of sleep in cognitive health. Despite some methodological limitations, their findings contribute valuable insights to the field of sleep research. Future studies should aim to address the identified limitations to strengthen the generalizability and applicability of the results.

Education Article Critique

Reference: Johnson, L. M., & White, P. D. (2023). The impact of technology integration on student learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology , 29(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeduc.2023.01.002 Introduction In the article “The Impact of Technology Integration on Student Learning Outcomes,” Johnson and White (2023) explore how incorporating digital tools and resources in the classroom affects students’ academic performance. The authors aim to identify both the benefits and challenges of technology integration in education. Summary Johnson and White (2023) evaluate various forms of technology integration, including interactive whiteboards, educational software, and online resources. They analyze the effects of these tools on student engagement, motivation, and achievement across different subjects and grade levels. The study presents data from several schools that have implemented these technologies, showing improvements in test scores and classroom participation. Critique The article by Johnson and White (2023) provides a comprehensive analysis of the positive impacts of technology on student learning. The use of multiple case studies strengthens the validity of their conclusions. However, the study’s focus on urban schools may not reflect the experiences of students in rural or underfunded schools, limiting the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the reliance on short-term data does not capture the long-term effects of technology integration on student learning. Conclusion Johnson and White (2023) make a compelling case for the positive impact of technology on student learning outcomes. While the article effectively demonstrates the benefits of digital tools, addressing the identified limitations would provide a more comprehensive understanding of technology integration in education. Future research should focus on long-term effects, diverse educational settings, and the challenges of teacher training and equitable access to technology.

Business Article Critique

Reference: Davis, K. L., & Roberts, J. H. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and business success: A review of recent research. Journal of Business Ethics , 38(4), 220-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbuseth.2021.02.003 Introduction In their article “Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Success: A Review of Recent Research,” Davis and Roberts (2021) explore how corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives impact business performance. The authors aim to demonstrate the benefits of CSR in enhancing corporate reputation and customer loyalty. Summary Davis and Roberts (2021) review several studies that analyze the outcomes of CSR initiatives across different industries. The article highlights positive correlations between CSR activities and financial performance, as well as improvements in brand reputation and customer satisfaction. The authors also discuss the potential challenges businesses face when implementing CSR programs. Critique Davis and Roberts (2021) provide a thorough review of the literature on CSR and its impact on business success. The article effectively synthesizes findings from various studies, supporting their argument that CSR can be beneficial for companies. However, the article could be improved by including more critical perspectives on CSR, such as potential drawbacks or instances where CSR initiatives have failed. Additionally, the authors do not provide detailed guidelines on how companies can measure the effectiveness of their CSR efforts. Conclusion Overall, Davis and Roberts (2021) make a strong case for the positive impact of CSR on business success. Their review underscores the importance of socially responsible practices in building a positive corporate image and achieving long-term profitability. Future research should address the limitations noted, particularly by exploring the challenges and failures of CSR initiatives and providing actionable metrics for evaluating their success.

Health Sciences Article Critique

Reference: Nguyen, M. T., & Kim, H. S. (2020). The effects of a plant-based diet on cardiovascular health: A systematic review. Journal of Nutritional Science , 17(3), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutrsci.2020.03.005 Introduction In the article “The Effects of a Plant-Based Diet on Cardiovascular Health: A Systematic Review,” Nguyen and Kim (2020) investigate the impact of plant-based diets on heart disease prevention and management. The authors aim to provide evidence supporting dietary recommendations for cardiovascular health. Summary Nguyen and Kim (2020) review multiple studies comparing the cardiovascular outcomes of individuals on plant-based diets versus those on omnivorous diets. Their findings suggest that plant-based diets are associated with lower cholesterol levels, reduced blood pressure, and decreased incidence of heart disease. The authors discuss potential mechanisms, such as reduced intake of saturated fats and increased consumption of fiber and antioxidants. Critique Nguyen and Kim (2020) present a comprehensive review of the cardiovascular benefits of plant-based diets. The inclusion of various studies strengthens the validity of their conclusions. However, the review would benefit from a more balanced discussion of potential challenges, such as the risk of nutrient deficiencies and the social and cultural barriers to adopting a plant-based diet. Additionally, the article focuses primarily on short-term studies, and more research on the long-term sustainability of these diets is needed. Conclusion Overall, Nguyen and Kim (2020) provide strong evidence supporting the cardiovascular benefits of plant-based diets. Their systematic review contributes valuable insights to the field of nutritional science. Future research should address the limitations identified, particularly regarding long-term sustainability and potential challenges in adhering to plant-based diets.

Social Sciences Article Critique

Reference: Lopez, G. R., & Thompson, S. L. (2021). Urban poverty and social policy: Examining the effectiveness of welfare programs. Journal of Social Policy , 43(2), 180-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.04.007 Introduction In the article “Urban Poverty and Social Policy: Examining the Effectiveness of Welfare Programs,” Lopez and Thompson (2021) analyze the impact of various welfare programs on reducing urban poverty. The authors aim to assess the effectiveness of these programs in improving the socioeconomic conditions of urban populations. Summary Lopez and Thompson (2021) evaluate several welfare programs, including food assistance, housing subsidies, and employment training initiatives. Their analysis reveals mixed outcomes, with some programs showing significant positive effects on poverty reduction, while others have minimal impact. The authors discuss factors contributing to these varied results, such as program design, implementation quality, and participant engagement. Critique Lopez and Thompson (2021) provide a detailed analysis of the effectiveness of welfare programs in addressing urban poverty. The article’s strength lies in its comprehensive evaluation of multiple programs and consideration of various influencing factors. However, the study relies on data from a limited number of cities, which may not be representative of broader urban contexts. Additionally, the authors could have included more qualitative data to provide deeper insights into the lived experiences of program participants. Conclusion Overall, Lopez and Thompson (2021) offer valuable insights into the effectiveness of welfare programs in reducing urban poverty. Their findings highlight the need for well-designed and effectively implemented programs to achieve meaningful poverty reduction. Future research should aim to include a more diverse range of urban settings and incorporate qualitative data to enrich the understanding of program impacts.

Examples of Thesis Statements for Article Critiques

Psychology article critique thesis statements.

• “The article successfully links mindfulness practices to reduced anxiety levels, yet it overlooks the potential variability in individual responses, which could affect the generalizability of the results.”
• “While the study provides significant insights into the effects of social media on adolescent self-esteem, its cross-sectional design limits the ability to infer causality.”

Literature Article Critique Thesis Statements

• “The article provides a nuanced analysis of the themes of isolation in ‘Frankenstein,’ but its limited engagement with contemporary critical perspectives reduces its impact.”
• “Although the article offers a compelling interpretation of symbolism in ‘Moby Dick,’ its narrow focus on literary devices neglects the broader socio-political context of the novel.”

Business Article Critique Thesis Statements

• “The article effectively highlights the benefits of agile project management in tech startups, but it fails to consider the potential downsides, such as the risk of scope creep and resource strain.”
• “Despite presenting a well-researched argument for the advantages of remote work, the article’s lack of empirical data on long-term productivity effects weakens its conclusions.”

Health Sciences Article Critique Thesis Statements

• “The article convincingly argues for the role of gut microbiota in mental health, though it would benefit from a more thorough exploration of the mechanisms underlying this relationship.”
• “While the study provides strong evidence for the benefits of intermittent fasting on metabolic health, its reliance on short-term studies limits the understanding of long-term effects.”

Education Article Critique Thesis Statements

• “The article makes a strong case for the use of gamification in education to enhance student motivation, yet it neglects to address potential challenges related to accessibility and equity.”
• “Despite effectively demonstrating the positive impacts of project-based learning on student engagement, the article lacks consideration of the additional resources and training required for successful implementation.”

Environmental Science Article Critique Thesis Statements

• “The article offers a comprehensive review of the impacts of deforestation on climate change, but it would be strengthened by incorporating more case studies from diverse geographic regions.”
• “While the article effectively discusses the potential of urban green spaces to mitigate air pollution, it underestimates the complexities of urban planning and maintenance costs.”

Social Sciences Article Critique Thesis Statements

• “The article provides valuable insights into the influence of cultural norms on gender roles, but its limited geographic focus restricts the applicability of its findings to a global context.”
• “Although the study sheds light on the relationship between economic inequality and crime rates, its reliance on correlational data makes it difficult to draw definitive causal conclusions.”

Example of Article Critique About Education

Article Title : The Impact of Technology Integration on Student Learning Outcomes Introduction The article “The Impact of Technology Integration on Student Learning Outcomes” investigates how the use of digital tools and resources in the classroom influences students’ academic performance. The research aims to identify the benefits and potential drawbacks of incorporating technology into educational settings. Summary The study evaluates various forms of technology integration, including interactive whiteboards, educational software, and online resources. It examines their effects on student engagement, motivation, and achievement across different subjects and grade levels. The article presents data from several schools that have implemented these technologies, showcasing improvements in test scores and classroom participation. Critique The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the positive impacts of technology on student learning. The use of multiple case studies strengthens the validity of its conclusions. However, the article could improve by addressing some critical aspects: Sample Size and Diversity : The study primarily focuses on schools in urban areas, which may not reflect the experiences of students in rural or underfunded schools. Expanding the sample size to include a more diverse range of schools would enhance the generalizability of the findings. Longitudinal Data : The research relies heavily on short-term data, which may not capture the long-term effects of technology integration on student learning. Longitudinal studies are necessary to understand the sustained impact of these tools. Teacher Training and Support : While the article highlights the benefits of technology, it overlooks the challenges teachers face in integrating these tools effectively. Providing adequate training and ongoing support is crucial for the successful implementation of technology in the classroom. Equity and Access : The article briefly mentions the digital divide but does not delve into how disparities in access to technology can affect educational outcomes. A more thorough examination of equity issues would provide a balanced perspective on the advantages and limitations of technology integration. Conclusion Overall, the article makes a compelling case for the positive impact of technology on student learning outcomes. It effectively demonstrates how digital tools can enhance engagement and academic performance. However, to provide a more comprehensive understanding, future research should address the limitations identified, particularly regarding sample diversity, long-term effects, teacher support, and equity issues. By doing so, the research could offer more actionable insights for policymakers and educators striving to harness the full potential of technology in education.

More Examples & Samples Article Critique in PDF

1. quantitative article critique.

2. Article Critique Guidelines

4. Critiquing Research Articles

4. Article Review & Critiques

5. Instructions for Article Critiques

6. Critique of an Academic Article

7. Critique and Review of Research Articles

8. Article Critique Assignment

9. Book Review or Article Critique

10. Press Article Critique

Purpose of Article Critique

An article critique serves multiple essential purposes in both academic and professional contexts. Below, we delve into the primary objectives of conducting an article critique, which are vital for developing critical thinking, analytical skills, and subject-specific knowledge.

1. Developing Critical Thinking Skills

Critical Evaluation:

• Encourages students and professionals to go beyond surface-level reading.
• Promotes a deeper understanding of the material by questioning the validity and reliability of the arguments presented.

Analytical Reasoning:

• Helps in identifying logical fallacies, biases, and unsupported claims.
• Facilitates the assessment of evidence and methodologies used in the article.

2. Enhancing Understanding of Subject Matter

In-Depth Analysis:

• Requires a thorough examination of the article’s content, including the main arguments, evidence, and conclusions.
• Enhances comprehension of complex concepts and theories within a specific field.

Contextual Awareness:

• Places the article within the broader context of existing literature.
• Identifies gaps in the research and suggests areas for further investigation.

3. Improving Academic Writing Skills

Structured Writing:

• Teaches students how to organize their thoughts coherently.
• Develops skills in writing clear, concise, and structured critiques.

Evidence-Based Arguments:

• Encourages the use of evidence to support evaluations and opinions.
• Helps in the practice of citing sources correctly and ethically.

4. Facilitating Peer Review and Feedback

Constructive Criticism:

• Provides a framework for giving and receiving constructive feedback.
• Enhances collaborative learning by engaging in discussions about the strengths and weaknesses of an article.

Quality Assurance:

• Plays a crucial role in academic publishing and professional fields by ensuring the quality and credibility of published work.
• Helps maintain high standards in research and scholarship.

5. Encouraging Lifelong Learning

Continual Improvement:

• Fosters a habit of continuous learning and improvement.
• Keeps individuals updated with the latest research, trends, and advancements in their field.

Adaptability:

• Prepares students and professionals to adapt to new information and changing paradigms.
• Cultivates a mindset that is open to questioning and re-evaluating established knowledge.

Components of an Article Critique

An effective article critique includes several key components to ensure a thorough evaluation and analysis. Below are the main components:

• Provide an overview of the article.
• Introduce the main thesis and key points.

Components:

• Title and Author: State the article’s title and author.
• Publication Details: Include publication name, date, etc.
• Thesis Statement: Summarize the article’s main argument.
• Purpose of the Critique: Explain your objective.
• Summarize the article’s content.
• Main Points: Highlight key arguments.
• Methodology: Describe research methods briefly.
• Findings and Conclusions: Outline main findings and conclusions.

3. Analysis

• Critically examine the article’s structure, content, and logic.
• Structure and Organization: Evaluate clarity and coherence.
• Content Evaluation: Assess relevance and depth.
• Argumentation: Analyze logical flow and evidence strength.
• Methodology: Critique research methods and identify biases.
• Sources and References: Evaluate quality and relevance of cited sources.

4. Evaluation

• Assess the article’s overall contribution.
• Strengths: Highlight strengths such as originality and depth.
• Weaknesses: Identify weaknesses like gaps and biases.
• Contribution to the Field: Discuss the article’s impact.
• Summarize the critique and provide final thoughts.
• Summary of Evaluation: Recap key points.
• Overall Assessment: Provide a final judgment.
• Recommendations: Suggest future research or improvements.
• List sources cited in your critique.
• Citations: Format according to the appropriate style (e.g., APA, MLA).

How to Write an Article Critique

Mastering the art of crafting an effective article critique requires a systematic approach. Here is a step-by-step guide to help you navigate this process with finesse.

Step 1: Reading and Observation

Before diving into the critique, thoroughly read the article. Take notes on the main points, observation ,  objectives , and tone of the article. Identify the author’s goals and the case study , if applicable. This step is crucial for grasping the nuances of the work.

Step 2: Analyzing Structure and Content

Evaluate the structure of the article. Identify the introduction, main arguments, supporting evidence, and conclusion. Examine the use of verbs and analogies , as well as the cause-and-effect relationships presented. Analyze how effectively the author communicates their ideas.

Step 3: Assessing Methodology and Evidence

Scrutinize the methodology used by the author. Is it appropriate for the objectives of the article? Evaluate the quality and relevance of the evidence presented. Consider whether the evidence supports the author’s claims adequately.

Step 4: Critical Evaluation

Engage in a critical evaluation of the article. Identify its strengths and weaknesses. Does the author effectively address counterarguments? Are there any gaps in the logic? Assess the overall coherence and effectiveness of the article’s presentation.

Why is article critique important?

It develops critical thinking, enhances understanding of the subject, improves academic writing skills, and provides constructive feedback.

What are the main components of an article critique?

Introduction, Summary, Analysis, Evaluation, Conclusion, and References.

How do I start an article critique?

Begin with an introduction that provides the article’s title, author, publication details, and a brief summary of its thesis and purpose.

What should be included in the summary?

Key points, research methods, findings, and conclusions of the article.

How do I analyze an article?

Examine the structure, content, logic, argumentation, methodology, and sources for clarity, relevance, and evidence strength.

What makes a good evaluation?

Balanced assessment of the article’s strengths and weaknesses, and its contribution to the field.

How should I conclude an article critique?

Summarize your findings, provide an overall assessment, and offer suggestions for improvement or future research.

How do I cite sources in an article critique?

Follow the appropriate citation style (e.g., APA, MLA) and ensure all references are correctly formatted.

What are common pitfalls to avoid in an article critique?

Avoid biased or overly negative reviews, lack of evidence for claims, and failure to provide a balanced perspective.

How can I ensure my critique is objective?

Use evidence to support your points, acknowledge both strengths and weaknesses, and avoid personal biases.

Text prompt

• Instructive
• Professional

10 Examples of Public speaking

20 Examples of Gas lighting

Stay ahead of the AI revolution.

How to Write a Critique of an Article: A Step-by-Step Guide

Whether you are a student or a professional, you may encounter the task of writing a critique of an article. This can be a daunting task if you're not familiar with the process. In this guide, we'll provide you with step-by-step instructions on how to write a critique that is well-structured, insightful, and informative.

Understanding the Purpose of a Critique

Before we delve into the specifics of writing a critique, it's essential to understand its purpose. A critique is a critical evaluation of an article that examines its strengths and weaknesses. It provides an analysis of the author's argument, evidence, and sources, as well as an evaluation of the article's organization, clarity, and overall effectiveness.

A critique serves as a tool for readers to evaluate the quality of an article. It helps readers to determine whether an article is worth reading and whether it provides valuable insights into a particular topic. A critique also helps readers to identify areas where the author could have improved the article, which can guide future research and writing.

What is a Critique?

A critique is an assessment of an article that involves a detailed analysis of the author's argument, evidence, and sources. It also evaluates the article's structure, writing style, and overall effectiveness. The purpose of a critique is to provide the reader with an informed assessment of the article's quality and value.

When writing a critique, it's important to remain objective and avoid personal biases. Your goal is to evaluate the article based on its merits and demerits, not on your personal opinions or beliefs. This requires careful analysis of the article, including its arguments, evidence, and sources.

The Importance of Critiquing Articles

Critiquing articles is an essential skill for students and professionals across different fields. It enables you to analyze the validity of an argument, assess the quality of evidence and sources, and provide feedback that can guide future research and writing. By honing your critique skills, you can become a more effective reader, writer, and researcher.

Critiquing articles also helps to promote critical thinking and intellectual rigor. It encourages readers to question assumptions, evaluate evidence, and consider alternative perspectives. This can lead to a deeper understanding of a particular topic and can help to advance knowledge in a particular field.

Different Types of Critiques

There are different types of critiques, each with its unique purpose. A literary critique, for instance, evaluates a work of literature, while a film critique assesses a movie's plot, acting, and direction. In this guide, we focus on writing a critique of an article.

When critiquing an article, it's important to consider the article's purpose and intended audience. This can help you to determine whether the author has achieved their goals and whether the article is relevant and useful to its intended audience.

Overall, critiquing articles is an important skill that can help readers to evaluate the quality and value of written works. By carefully analyzing an article's strengths and weaknesses, readers can provide valuable feedback that can guide future research and writing, promoting intellectual rigor and advancing knowledge in a particular field.

Preparing to Write a Critique

Preparation is a crucial part of writing an effective critique. It involves reading the article thoroughly, taking notes, identifying key points, and analyzing the article's structure and content.

Read the Article Thoroughly

Before you begin writing a critique, read the article thoroughly. Go beyond surface-level reading and try to understand the author's perspective, thesis, and supporting arguments. Take note of any unclear or confusing sections, inconsistencies, or contradictions.

Take Notes and Identify Key Points

As you read the article, take notes on key points that stand out to you. Identify the author's thesis, main arguments, supporting evidence, and sources. Note any instances where the author uses persuasive language, engages with counterarguments, or addresses potential weaknesses in their argument.

Analyze the Article's Structure and Content

After reading and noting the article's key points, analyze its structure and content. Evaluate whether the author's argument is logical and well-organized. Assess the article's use of evidence and sources, and determine whether they are credible and relevant to the topic. Consider the article's writing style and assess its clarity and coherence.

Writing the Introduction

The introduction sets the stage for your critique. It should provide basic information about the article, state your thesis or main argument, and outline your critique's structure.

Provide Basic Information about the Article

In the introduction, provide basic information about the article you are critiquing. Include the article's title, author's name, publication date, and the journal or website where it was published.

State Your Thesis or Main Argument

The thesis statement communicates your stance on the article and your main argument. It should be clear, concise, and specific. Your thesis statement should be informed by your analysis of the article's structure, content, and context.

Outline Your Critique's Structure

In the introduction, provide a brief overview of your critique's structure. This might include a summary of the main arguments you will make in the body of your critique, or an outline of the sections you will cover.

Evaluating the Article's Content

The body of your critique should focus on evaluating the author's content, arguments, evidence, and sources.

Assess the Author's Main Points

Evaluate the author's main points and assess whether they are valid and persuasive. Explain why you agree or disagree with the arguments presented and provide evidence to support your claims.

Analyze the Author's Evidence and Sources

Assess the author's evidence and sources for credibility and relevance. Consider whether the author uses primary or secondary sources, whether the sources are current, and whether the author effectively incorporates the sources into their argument.

Discuss the Article's Organization and Clarity

Evaluate the article's organization and clarity. Analyze whether the author's argument is well-structured and easy to follow. Assess whether the author's writing style is clear and coherent.

ChatGPT Prompt for Writing a Critique of an Article

Chatgpt prompt.

Please compose a thorough and analytical evaluation of a chosen article, examining its strengths and weaknesses, assessing its arguments and evidence, and providing your own informed and reasoned perspective on the topic at hand. Your critique should demonstrate your critical thinking skills and your ability to engage with complex ideas and concepts, while also offering constructive feedback and suggestions for improvement.

[ADD ADDITIONAL CONTEXT. CAN USE BULLET POINTS.]

Your conclusion should summarize your critique and restate your thesis or main argument. It may also suggest areas for future research or provide recommendations based on your assessment of the article.

• Be specific and provide evidence to support your claims. Avoid making sweeping statements without supporting evidence.
• Use transitional phrases to guide your reader through your critique. These phrases help to maintain coherence and connect one section to another.
• Proofread your critique for grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors. Also, ensure that your critique is formatted correctly and that your links, if any, work correctly.

By following these steps, you can write a critique that is well-structured, insightful, and informative. Remember, critiquing articles is an essential skill that can benefit your academic and professional development. Practice your critique skills regularly, and you'll soon become an expert at evaluating and providing informed feedback on articles and other publications.

Recommended Articles

How to write an ebook: a step-by-step guide, how to write a press release for an event: a step-by-step guide, feeling behind on ai, get the latest ai.

Get Your Free ChatGPT Training!

ChatGPT: Zero to Power User Cheat Sheet

• Top AI tools to use at work.
• Prompt frameworks.
• What NOT to use ChatGPT for.

Free AI Course for Professionals

Why 400,000+ Professionals Use The Neuron to Have An Edge Over Peers At Work

Journal Article Critique Guide and Example in 2025.

Journal article critiques are essential tools in academic and professional fields, providing a structured method to analyze and evaluate scholarly work. As we move into 2025, the importance of critical analysis in an age of information overload has only increased. This guide will walk you through the process of crafting a comprehensive journal article critique, highlighting key components and offering practical tips for success.

A journal article critique goes beyond mere summarization, delving into the strengths and weaknesses of the research presented. It requires a careful examination of the article’s methodology, findings, and conclusions, all while considering its relevance and contribution to the field. By mastering the art of critique, you’ll develop crucial skills in critical thinking, analytical writing, and scholarly discourse.

In this Journal Article Critique Guide. we’ll explore the step-by-step process of creating a journal article critique, from initial reading strategies to final presentation. We’ll also provide a detailed example to illustrate these concepts in action, ensuring you have a clear understanding of how to apply these principles to your own work.

What You'll Learn

Understanding the Purpose and Structure of a Journal Article Critique

The primary purpose of a journal article critique is to provide a balanced and objective evaluation of a scholarly work. This evaluation serves multiple functions in the academic community:

• Quality control: Critiques help maintain high standards in research by identifying strengths and weaknesses in published work.
• Knowledge advancement: By analyzing existing research, critiques contribute to the ongoing dialogue within a field and can inspire new avenues of inquiry.
• Skill development: Writing critiques hones critical thinking, analytical, and communication skills essential for academics and professionals.

A well-structured journal article critique typically includes the following components:

• Introduction: Provides an overview of the article and your main assessment.
• Summary: Concisely presents the key points of the original article.
• Critique: Offers a detailed analysis of the article’s strengths and weaknesses.
• Conclusion: Summarizes your overall evaluation and the article’s significance.

Understanding this structure is crucial for organizing your thoughts and presenting a coherent critique. Each section builds upon the previous one, guiding the reader through your analysis and supporting your final assessment.

As we move into 2025, the ability to critically evaluate research has become increasingly important. With the rapid dissemination of information and the growing interdisciplinary nature of many fields, a well-crafted critique can serve as a valuable resource for researchers, students, and professionals alike.

Preparing to Write: Initial Reading and Note-Taking Strategies

Before diving into the critique itself, it’s essential to approach the journal article with a strategic reading and note-taking process. This preparation phase sets the foundation for a thorough and insightful critique.

First Reading: Begin with a quick, overall read of the article to grasp its main ideas and structure. Pay attention to the abstract, introduction, headings, and conclusion. This initial pass helps you understand the article’s general argument and methodology without getting bogged down in details.

Second Reading: During your second, more careful reading, focus on the following elements:

• Research question or hypothesis
• Methodology and data collection
• Results and analysis
• Conclusions and implications
• References and citations

As you read, take detailed notes on each of these aspects. Use a system that works for you, whether it’s digital note-taking tools, handwritten notes, or a combination of both. Consider using a template or table to organize your observations systematically.

Critical Questions: While reading, ask yourself critical questions such as:

• Is the research question clearly stated and relevant?
• Does the methodology appropriately address the research question?
• Are the results presented clearly and interpreted accurately?
• Do the conclusions logically follow from the results?
• Is the article well-organized and clearly written?

By 2025, advanced AI-powered tools may be available to assist in this process, potentially offering automated summaries or highlighting key points. However, developing your own critical reading skills remains crucial for producing insightful critiques.

Analyzing the Article’s Content and Methodology

Once you’ve thoroughly read and taken notes on the article, it’s time to delve deeper into your analysis. This section of your critique should focus on evaluating the content and methodology of the research.

Content Analysis: Examine the article’s arguments, evidence, and theoretical framework. Consider the following:

• Clarity and coherence of the main argument
• Quality and relevance of evidence presented
• Logical flow of ideas and reasoning
• Appropriate use of relevant literature and theories
• Identification and addressing of potential counterarguments

Methodology Evaluation: Assess the research design and methods used in the study:

• Appropriateness of the chosen methodology for the research question
• Sample size and selection process (if applicable)
• Data collection techniques and their potential limitations
• Validity and reliability of measurements or instruments used
• Ethical considerations in the research process

Data Analysis and Interpretation: Scrutinize how the authors analyzed their data and interpreted the results:

• Suitability of statistical tests or qualitative analysis methods
• Clarity and accuracy of data presentation (tables, graphs, etc.)
• Thoroughness of the analysis in addressing all aspects of the research question
• Consideration of alternative explanations for the findings
• Acknowledgment of limitations in the study design or results

As you analyze these elements, remember to balance criticism with recognition of the article’s strengths. A fair and balanced critique acknowledges both the positive aspects and areas for improvement in the research.

Evaluating the Article’s Contribution to the Field

An essential aspect of your critique is assessing the article’s overall contribution to its field of study. This evaluation helps contextualize the research within the broader academic landscape and highlights its significance.

Relevance and Originality: Consider how the article advances knowledge in its area:

• Does it address a gap in existing literature?
• Does it challenge or confirm previous findings?
• Does it introduce new concepts, methodologies, or theoretical frameworks?
• How does it build upon or diverge from established research in the field?

Practical and Theoretical Implications: Examine the potential impact of the research:

• What are the practical applications of the findings?
• How might the results influence future research directions?
• Does the study have implications for policy or practice in its field?
• Are there potential interdisciplinary connections or applications?

Comparison with Similar Research: Place the article in context with related studies:

• How does this research compare to similar studies in terms of methodology and findings?
• Does it offer any unique perspectives or insights?
• Are there any contradictions with established research that need to be addressed?

Long-term Significance: Consider the lasting impact of the research:

• Is the topic likely to remain relevant in the coming years?
• Does the article lay groundwork for future studies?
• How might technological advancements or societal changes affect the relevance of this research?

By thoroughly evaluating these aspects, you can provide a comprehensive assessment of the article’s contribution and significance within its field. This analysis not only adds depth to your critique but also demonstrates your understanding of the broader academic context.

Crafting Your Critique: Writing Tips and Best Practices

Now that you’ve thoroughly analyzed the article, it’s time to translate your insights into a well-structured critique. Follow these writing tips and best practices to ensure your critique is clear, comprehensive, and professional.

Organization:

• Follow the standard structure: introduction, summary, critique, and conclusion.
• Use clear headings and subheadings to guide your reader through each section.
• Ensure a logical flow of ideas within and between paragraphs.

Tone and Style:

• Maintain an objective and scholarly tone throughout your critique.
• Use precise language and avoid unnecessary jargon.
• Strike a balance between formal academic writing and accessibility.

Supporting Your Arguments:

• Provide specific examples from the article to support your points.
• Use direct quotes sparingly and always cite them properly.
• Reference relevant literature to contextualize your critique.

Balancing Criticism and Praise:

• Acknowledge the article’s strengths as well as its weaknesses.
• Offer constructive criticism rather than merely pointing out flaws.
• Provide suggestions for improvement or future research directions.

Clarity and Concision:

• Be clear and direct in your assessments.
• Avoid repetition and unnecessary elaboration.
• Use transition sentences to connect different points and sections.

Proofreading and Editing:

• Review your critique for grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
• Ensure consistency in formatting and citation style.
• Consider having a peer review your critique for additional feedback.

By following these guidelines, you’ll create a polished and professional critique that effectively communicates your analysis. Remember, the goal is to provide a fair and insightful evaluation that contributes to the academic discourse surrounding the article’s topic.

Example: A Sample Journal Article Critique

To illustrate the principles discussed in this guide, let’s examine a sample critique of a hypothetical journal article titled “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Workplace Dynamics in 2025” by J. Smith and A. Lee, published in the Journal of Future Work Studies.

Introduction: This critique evaluates Smith and Lee’s (2025) article on the influence of AI in contemporary workplaces. The study provides valuable insights into the changing nature of work but has some methodological limitations that warrant discussion.

Summary: Smith and Lee conducted a mixed-methods study involving surveys of 500 employees across various industries and in-depth interviews with 50 managers. They argue that AI integration in workplaces has led to significant shifts in job roles, skill requirements, and organizational structures. Key findings include:

• 60% of surveyed employees reported changes in their job responsibilities due to AI implementation.
• Managers identified critical thinking and AI literacy as essential skills for future workforce.
• Organizations are increasingly adopting flatter structures to facilitate human-AI collaboration.

Critique: Strengths:

• Timely and relevant topic addressing a critical aspect of modern work environments.
• Comprehensive mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative data with qualitative insights.
• Clear presentation of findings with well-designed graphs and tables.

Weaknesses:

• Limited sample size for the qualitative component may not capture the full range of managerial perspectives.
• Potential selection bias in the survey sample, with a skew towards tech-savvy respondents.
• Lack of longitudinal data to support claims about long-term trends.

The authors provide a compelling argument for the transformative impact of AI on workplace dynamics. However, their conclusions could be strengthened by addressing the limitations in their methodology and considering alternative explanations for their findings.

Conclusion: Despite its limitations, this study offers valuable insights into the evolving relationship between AI and human workers. It lays a foundation for future research and has important implications for workforce development and organizational planning in the AI era.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid in Journal Article Critiques

When writing a journal article critique, be aware of these common pitfalls that can diminish the quality and effectiveness of your analysis:

• Summarizing without critiquing: While a summary is important, the bulk of your critique should focus on analysis and evaluation. Avoid simply restating the article’s content without offering your own insights.
• Personal bias: Maintain objectivity in your critique. Don’t let your personal opinions or preconceptions about the topic unduly influence your evaluation of the research.
• Nitpicking: Focus on significant aspects of the article rather than minor issues. Critiquing every small detail can detract from your main arguments.
• Lack of balance: Avoid focusing solely on either strengths or weaknesses. A good critique acknowledges both positive aspects and areas for improvement.
• Unsupported claims: Always provide evidence or reasoning to support your critiques. Avoid making broad statements without backing them up.
• Misunderstanding the article: Ensure you fully understand the article’s content and methodology before critiquing it. Misinterpretations can lead to irrelevant or inaccurate criticisms.
• Ignoring context: Consider the article within its broader academic and historical context. Don’t critique it based on current knowledge if it was groundbreaking at the time of publication.
• Overreliance on direct quotes: While quotes can be useful, overusing them can make your critique seem unoriginal. Paraphrase and synthesize information where appropriate.
• Lack of structure: Organize your critique logically. A disorganized critique can be confusing and less impactful.
• Offering vague suggestions: When proposing improvements or future research directions, be as specific as possible. Vague suggestions add little value to your critique.

By avoiding these pitfalls, you can ensure that your critique is focused, balanced, and contributes meaningfully to the academic discourse surrounding the article’s topic.

The Future of Journal Article Critiques: Trends and Technologies

As we look ahead to 2025 and beyond, several trends and technologies are shaping the landscape of journal article critiques:

• AI-assisted analysis: Advanced AI tools are emerging to help researchers identify patterns, inconsistencies, and potential biases in academic articles. These tools can complement human analysis, offering additional insights and saving time.
• Interactive critiques: Digital platforms are enabling more dynamic and interactive forms of critique. Readers can engage with critiques through comments, annotations, and real-time discussions, fostering a more collaborative approach to academic discourse.
• Data visualization: As research becomes increasingly data-driven, critiques are incorporating more sophisticated data visualization techniques to illustrate key points and analyses.
• Open peer review: There’s a growing trend towards transparency in the peer review process. This may influence how critiques are written and shared, with a focus on constructive feedback and open dialogue.
• Interdisciplinary approaches: As research becomes more interdisciplinary, critiques are increasingly drawing on diverse fields of knowledge to provide comprehensive evaluations.
• Emphasis on reproducibility: With the replication crisis in various fields, critiques are placing greater emphasis on evaluating the reproducibility of research findings.
• Real-time updates: In fast-moving fields, critiques may need to be updated as new information emerges. Dynamic publishing platforms could allow for ongoing refinement of critiques.
• Accessibility and inclusivity: There’s a growing focus on making academic discourse more accessible to diverse audiences, which may influence the language and format of critiques.
• Ethical considerations: As research tackles more complex and sensitive topics, critiques are paying increased attention to the ethical implications of studies.
• Integration with systematic reviews: Critiques may become more closely linked with systematic review processes, contributing to broader syntheses of research in particular fields.

Related Article: Literature Topics and Research

FAQs on Journal Article Critique Guide

How do you write a journal critique?

To write a journal critique, start by thoroughly reading the article and taking notes. Then, structure your critique with an introduction, summary, detailed analysis of strengths and weaknesses, and a conclusion. Focus on evaluating the research question, methodology, results, and conclusions. Provide evidence for your assessments and maintain an objective tone throughout.

What are some examples of critiques?

Examples of critiques include book reviews, film critiques, art criticism, and academic peer reviews. In an academic context, journal article critiques, literature reviews, and research proposal evaluations are common forms of critique.

How to write a critique example?

To write a critique example, choose a specific article or work to analyze. Follow the structure outlined in this guide: introduce the work, summarize its main points, provide a detailed analysis of its strengths and weaknesses, and conclude with your overall assessment. Use specific examples from the work to support your points.

Start by filling this short order form order.studyinghq.com

And then follow the progressive flow. 

Having an issue, chat with us here

Cathy, CS. 

New Concept ? Let a subject expert write your paper for You​

Post navigation

Previous post.

📕 Studying HQ

Typically replies within minutes

Hey! 👋 Need help with an assignment?

🟢 Online | Privacy policy

WhatsApp us

A guide for critique of research articles

Following is the list of criteria to evaluate (critique) a research article. Please note that you should first summarize the paper and then evaluate different parts of it.

Most of the evaluation section should be devoted to evaluation of internal validity of the conclusions. Please add at the end a section entitled ''changes in the design/procedures if I want to replicate this study." Attach a copy of the original article to your paper.

Click here to see a an example (this is how you start) of a research critique.

Click here to see the original article.

The following list is a guide for you to organize your evaluation. It is recommended to organize your evaluation in this order. This is a long list of questions. You don’t have to address all questions. However, you should address highlighted questions . Some questions may not be relevant to your article.

Introduction

1.     Is there a statement of the problem?

2.     Is the problem “researchable”? That is, can it be investigated through the collection and analysis of data?

3.     Is background information on the problem presented?

4.     Is the educational significance of the problem discussed?

5.     Does the problem statement indicate the variables of interest and the specific relationship between those variables which are investigated? When necessary, are variables directly or operationally defined?

Review of Related Literature

1.     Is the review comprehensive?

2.     Are all cited references relevant to the problem under investigation?

3.     Are most of the sources primary, i.e., are there only a few or no secondary sources?

4.     Have the references been critically analyzed and the results of various studies compared and contrasted, i.e., is the review more than a series of abstracts or annotations?

5.     Does the review conclude with a brief summary of the literature and its implications for the problem investigated?

6.     Do the implications discussed form an empirical or theoretical rationale for the hypotheses which follow?

1.     Are specific questions to be answered listed or specific hypotheses to be tested stated?

2.     Does each hypothesis state an expected relationship or difference?

3.     If necessary, are variables directly or operationally defined?

4.     Is each hypothesis testable?

Method          Subjects

1.     Are the size and major characteristics of the population studied described?

2.     If a sample was selected, is the method of selecting the sample clearly described?

3.      Is the method of sample selection described one that is likely to result in a representative, unbiased sample?

4.     Did the researcher avoid the use of volunteers?

5.     Are the size and major characteristics of the sample described?

6.     Does the sample size meet the suggested guideline for minimum sample size appropriate for the method of research represented?      

Instruments

1.     Is the rationale given for the selection of the instruments (or measurements) used?

2.     Is each instrument described in terms of purpose and content?

3.     Are the instruments appropriate for measuring the intended variables?

4.     Is evidence presented that indicates that each instrument is appropriate for the sample under study?

5.     Is instrument validity discussed and coefficients given if appropriate?

6.     Is reliability discussed in terms of type and size of reliability coefficients?

7.     If appropriate, are subtest reliabilities given?

8.     If an instrument was developed specifically for the study, are the procedures involved in its development and validation described?

9.     If an instrument was developed specifically for the study, are administration, scoring or tabulating, and interpretation procedures fully described?

Design and Procedure

1.     Is the design appropriate for answering the questions or testing the hypotheses of the   study?

2.     Are the procedures described in sufficient detail to permit them to be replicated by another researcher?

3.     If a pilot study was conducted, are its execution and results described as well as its impact on the subsequent study?

4.     Are the control procedures described?

5.     Did the researcher discuss or account for any potentially confounding variables that he or she was unable to control for?

1.     Are appropriate descriptive or inferential statistics presented?

2.     Was the probability level, α, at which the results of the tests of significance were evaluated,

       specified in advance of the data analyses?

3.     If parametric tests were used, is there evidence that the researcher avoided violating the

       required assumptions for parametric tests?

4.     Are the tests of significance described appropriate, given the hypotheses and design of the

       study?

5.     Was every hypothesis tested?

6.     Are the tests of significance interpreted using the appropriate degrees of freedom?

7.     Are the results clearly presented?

8.     Are the tables and figures (if any) well organized and easy to understand?

9.     Are the data in each table and figure described in the text?

Discussion (Conclusions and Recommendation)

1.     Is each result discussed in terms of the original hypothesis to which it relates?

2.     Is each result discussed in terms of its agreement or disagreement with previous results

        obtained by other researchers in other studies?

3.     Are generalizations consistent with the results?

4.     Are the possible effects of uncontrolled variables on the results discussed?

5.     Are theoretical and practical implications of the findings discussed?

6.     Are recommendations for future action made?

7.     Are the suggestions for future action based on practical significance or on statistical

       significance only, i.e., has the author avoided confusing practical and statistical

       significance?

8.     Are recommendations for future research made?

Additional general questions to be answered in your critique.

1. What is (are) the research question(s) (or hypothesis)?

2. Describe the sample used in this study.

3. Describe the reliability and validity of all the instruments used.

4. What type of research is this?  Explain.

5. How was the data analyzed?

6. What is (are) the major finding(s)?

• All eBooks & Audiobooks
• Academic eBook Collection
• Home Grown eBook Collection
• Off-Campus Access
• Literature Resource Center
• Opposing Viewpoints
• ProQuest Central
• Course Guides
• Citing Sources
• Library Research
• Websites by Topic
• Book-a-Librarian
• Research Tutorials
• Use the Catalog
• Use Databases
• Use Films on Demand
• Use Home Grown eBooks
• Use NC LIVE
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary vs. Secondary
• Scholarly vs. Popular
• Make an Appointment
• Writing Tools
• Annotated Bibliographies
• Summaries, Reviews & Critiques
• Writing Center

Service Alert

Article Summaries, Reviews & Critiques

• Writing an article SUMMARY
• Writing an article REVIEW

Writing an article CRITIQUE

• Citing Sources This link opens in a new window
• About RCC Library

Text: 336-308-8801

Email: [email protected]

Call: 336-633-0204

Schedule: Book-a-Librarian

Like us on Facebook

Links on this guide may go to external web sites not connected with Randolph Community College. Their inclusion is not an endorsement by Randolph Community College and the College is not responsible for the accuracy of their content or the security of their site.

A critique asks you to evaluate an article and the author’s argument. You will need to look critically at what the author is claiming, evaluate the research methods, and look for possible problems with, or applications of, the researcher’s claims.

Introduction

Give an overview of the author’s main points and how the author supports those points. Explain what the author found and describe the process they used to arrive at this conclusion.

Body Paragraphs

Interpret the information from the article:

• Does the author review previous studies? Is current and relevant research used?
• What type of research was used – empirical studies, anecdotal material, or personal observations?
• Was the sample too small to generalize from?
• Was the participant group lacking in diversity (race, gender, age, education, socioeconomic status, etc.)
• For instance, volunteers gathered at a health food store might have different attitudes about nutrition than the population at large.
• How useful does this work seem to you? How does the author suggest the findings could be applied and how do you believe they could be applied?
• How could the study have been improved in your opinion?
• Does the author appear to have any biases (related to gender, race, class, or politics)?
• Is the writing clear and easy to follow? Does the author’s tone add to or detract from the article?
• How useful are the visuals (such as tables, charts, maps, photographs) included, if any? How do they help to illustrate the argument? Are they confusing or hard to read?
• What further research might be conducted on this subject?

Try to synthesize the pieces of your critique to emphasize your own main points about the author’s work, relating the researcher’s work to your own knowledge or to topics being discussed in your course.

From the Center for Academic Excellence (opens in a new window), University of Saint Joseph Connecticut

Additional Resources

All links open in a new window.

Writing an Article Critique (from The University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center)

How to Critique an Article (from Essaypro.com)

How to Write an Article Critique (from EliteEditing.com.au)

• << Previous: Writing an article REVIEW
• Next: Citing Sources >>
• Last Updated: Mar 15, 2024 9:32 AM
• URL: https://libguides.randolph.edu/summaries