business plan structure mckinsey

A better way to drive your business

Managing the availability of supply to meet volatile demand has never been easy. Even before the unprecedented challenges created by the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine, synchronizing supply and demand was a perennial struggle for most businesses. In a survey of 54 senior executives, only about one in four believed that the processes of their companies balanced cross-functional trade-offs effectively or facilitated decision making to help the P&L of the full business.

That’s not because of a lack of effort. Most companies have made strides to strengthen their planning capabilities in recent years. Many have replaced their processes for sales and operations planning (S&OP) with the more sophisticated approach of integrated business planning (IBP), which shows great promise, a conclusion based on an in-depth view of the processes used by many leading companies around the world (see sidebar “Understanding IBP”). Assessments of more than 170 companies, collected over five years, provide insights into the value created by IBP implementations that work well—and the reasons many IBP implementations don’t.

Understanding IBP

Integrated business planning is a powerful process that could become central to how a company runs its business. It is one generation beyond sales and operations planning. Three essential differentiators add up to a unique business-steering capability:

• Full business scope. Beyond balancing sales and operations planning, integrated business planning (IBP) synchronizes all of a company’s mid- and long-term plans, including the management of revenues, product pipelines and portfolios, strategic projects and capital investments, inventory policies and deployment, procurement strategies, and joint capacity plans with external partners. It does this in all relevant parts of the organization, from the site level through regions and business units and often up to a corporate-level plan for the full business.
• Risk management, alongside strategy and performance reviews. Best-practice IBP uses scenario planning to drive decisions. In every stage of the process, there are varying degrees of confidence about how the future will play out—how much revenue is reasonably certain as a result of consistent consumption patterns, how much additional demand might emerge if certain events happen, and how much unusual or extreme occurrences might affect that additional demand. These layers are assessed against business targets, and options for mitigating actions and potential gap closures are evaluated and chosen.
• Real-time financials. To ensure consistency between volume-based planning and financial projections (that is, value-based planning), IBP promotes strong links between operational and financial planning. This helps to eliminate surprises that may otherwise become apparent only in quarterly or year-end reviews.

An effective IBP process consists of five essential building blocks: a business-backed design; high-quality process management, including inputs and outputs; accountability and performance management; the effective use of data, analytics, and technology; and specialized organizational roles and capabilities (Exhibit 1). Our research finds that mature IBP processes can significantly improve coordination and reduce the number of surprises. Compared with companies that lack a well-functioning IBP process, the average mature IBP practitioner realizes one or two additional percentage points in EBIT. Service levels are five to 20 percentage points higher. Freight costs and capital intensity are 10 to 15 percent lower—and customer delivery penalties and missed sales are 40 to 50 percent lower. IBP technology and process discipline can also make planners 10 to 20 percent more productive.

When IBP processes are set up correctly, they help companies to make and execute plans and to monitor, simulate, and adapt their strategic assumptions and choices to succeed in their markets. However, leaders must treat IBP not just as a planning-process upgrade but also as a company-wide business initiative (see sidebar “IBP in action” for a best-in-class example).

IBP in action

One global manufacturer set up its integrated business planning (IBP) system as the sole way it ran its entire business, creating a standardized, integrated process for strategic, tactical, and operational planning. Although the company had previously had a sales and operations planning (S&OP) process, it had been owned and led solely by the supply chain function. Beyond S&OP, the sales function forecast demand in aggregate dollar value at the category level and over short time horizons. Finance did its own projections of the quarterly P&L, and data from day-by-day execution fed back into S&OP only at the start of a new monthly cycle.

The CEO endorsed a new way of running regional P&Ls and rolling up plans to the global level. The company designed its IBP process so that all regional general managers owned the regional IBP by sponsoring the integrated decision cycles (following a global design) and by ensuring functional ownership of the decision meetings. At the global level, the COO served as tiebreaker whenever decisions—such as procurement strategies for global commodities, investments in new facilities for global product launches, or the reconfiguration of a product’s supply chain—cut across regional interests.

To enable IBP to deliver its impact, the company conducted a structured process assessment to evaluate the maturity of all inputs into IBP. It then set out to redesign, in detail, its processes for planning demand and supply, inventory strategies, parametrization, and target setting, so that IBP would work with best-practice inputs. To encourage collaboration, leaders also started to redefine the performance management system so that it included clear accountability for not only the metrics that each function controlled but also shared metrics. Finally, digital dashboards were developed to track and monitor the realization of benefits for individual functions, regional leaders, and the global IBP team.

A critical component of the IBP rollout was creating a company-wide awareness of its benefits and the leaders’ expectations for the quality of managers’ contributions and decision-making discipline. To educate and show commitment from the CEO down, this information was rolled out in a campaign of town halls and media communications to all employees. The company also set up a formal capability-building program for the leaders and participants in the IBP decision cycle.

Rolled out in every region, the new training helps people learn how to run an effective IBP cycle, to recognize the signs of good process management, and to internalize decision authority, thresholds, and escalation paths. Within a few months, the new process, led by a confident and motivated leadership team, enabled closer company-wide collaboration during tumultuous market conditions. That offset price inflation for materials (which adversely affected peers) and maintained the company’s EBITDA performance.

Our research shows that these high-maturity IBP examples are in the minority. In practice, few companies use the IBP process to support effective decision making (Exhibit 2). For two-thirds of the organizations in our data set, IBP meetings are periodic business reviews rather than an integral part of the continuous cycle of decisions and adjustments needed to keep organizations aligned with their strategic and tactical goals. Some companies delegate IBP to junior staff. The frequency of meetings averages one a month. That can make these processes especially ineffective—lacking either the senior-level participation for making consequential strategic decisions or the frequency for timely operational reactions.

Finally, most companies struggle to turn their plans into effective actions: critical metrics and responsibilities are not aligned across functions, so it’s hard to steer the business in a collaborative way. Who is responsible for the accuracy of forecasts? What steps will be taken to improve it? How about adherence to the plan? Are functions incentivized to hold excess inventory? Less than 10 percent of all companies have a performance management system that encourages the right behavior across the organization.

By contrast, at the most effective organizations, IBP meetings are all about decisions and their impact on the P&L—an impact enabled by focused metrics and incentives for collaboration. Relevant inputs (data, insights, and decision scenarios) are diligently prepared and syndicated before meetings to help decision makers make the right choices quickly and effectively. These companies support IBP by managing their short-term planning decisions prescriptively, specifying thresholds to distinguish changes immediately integrated into existing plans from day-to-day noise. Within such boundaries, real-time daily decisions are made in accordance with the objectives of the entire business, not siloed frontline functions. This responsive execution is tightly linked with the IBP process, so that the fact base is always up-to-date for the next planning iteration.

A better plan for IBP

In our experience, integrated business planning can help a business succeed in a sustainable way if three conditions are met. First, the process must be designed for the P&L owner, not individual functions in the business. Second, processes are built for purpose, not from generic best-practice templates. Finally, the people involved in the process have the authority, skills, and confidence to make relevant, consequential decisions.

Design for the P&L owner

IBP gives leaders a systematic opportunity to unlock P&L performance by coordinating strategies and tactics across traditional business functions. This doesn’t mean that IBP won’t function as a business review process, but it is more effective when focused on decisions in the interest of the whole business. An IBP process designed to help P&L owners make effective decisions as they run the company creates requirements different from those of a process owned by individual functions, such as supply chain or manufacturing.

One fundamental requirement is senior-level participation from all stakeholder functions and business areas, so that decisions can be made in every meeting. The design of the IBP cycle, including preparatory work preceding decision-making meetings, should help leaders make general decisions or resolve minor issues outside of formal milestone meetings. It should also focus the attention of P&L leaders on the most important and pressing issues. These goals can be achieved with disciplined approaches to evaluating the impact of decisions and with financial thresholds that determine what is brought to the attention of the P&L leader.

The aggregated output of the IBP process would be a full, risk-evaluated business plan covering a midterm planning horizon. This plan then becomes the only accepted and executed plan across the organization. The objective isn’t a single hard number. It is an accepted, unified view of which new products will come online and when, and how they will affect the performance of the overall portfolio. The plan will also take into account the variabilities and uncertainties of the business: demand expectations, how the company will respond to supply constraints, and so on. Layered risks and opportunities and aligned actions across stakeholders indicate how to execute the plan.

Would you like to learn more about our Operations Practice ?

Trade-offs arising from risks and opportunities in realizing revenues, margins, or cost objectives are determined by the P&L owner at the level where those trade-offs arise—local for local, global for global. To make this possible, data visible in real time and support for decision making in meetings are essential. This approach works best in companies with strong data governance processes and tools, which increase confidence in the objectivity of the IBP process and support for implementing the resulting decisions. In addition, senior leaders can demonstrate their commitment to the value and the standards of IBP by participating in the process, sponsoring capability-building efforts for the teams that contribute inputs to the IBP, and owning decisions and outcomes.

Fit-for-purpose process design and frequency

To make IBP a value-adding capability, the business will probably need to redesign its planning processes from a clean sheet.

First, clean sheeting IBP means that it should be considered and designed from the decision maker’s perspective. What information does a P&L owner need to make a decision on a given topic? What possible scenarios should that leader consider, and what would be their monetary and nonmonetary impact? The IBP process can standardize this information—for example, by summarizing it in templates so that the responsible parties know, up front, which data, analytics, and impact information to provide.

Second, essential inputs into IBP determine its quality. These inputs include consistency in the way planners use data, methods, and systems to make accurate forecasts, manage constraints, simulate scenarios, and close the loop from planning to the production shopfloor by optimizing schedules, monitoring adherence, and using incentives to manufacture according to plan.

Determining the frequency of the IBP cycle, and its timely integration with tactical execution processes, would also be part of this redesign. Big items—such as capacity investments and divestments, new-product introductions, and line extensions—should be reviewed regularly. Monthly reviews are typical, but a quarterly cadence may also be appropriate in situations with less frequent changes. Weekly iterations then optimize the plan in response to confirmed orders, short-term capacity constraints, or other unpredictable events. The bidirectional link between planning and execution must be strong, and investments in technology may be required to better connect them, so that they use the same data repository and have continuous-feedback loops.

Authorize consequential decision making

Finally, every IBP process step needs autonomous decision making for the problems in its scope, as well as a clear path to escalate, if necessary. The design of the process must therefore include decision-type authority, decision thresholds, and escalation paths. Capability-building interventions should support teams to ensure disciplined and effective decision making—and that means enforcing participation discipline, as well. The failure of a few key stakeholders to prioritize participation can undermine the whole process.

Decision-making autonomy is also relevant for short-term planning and execution. Success in tactical execution depends on how early a problem is identified and how quickly and effectively it is resolved. A good execution framework includes, for example, a classification of possible events, along with resolution guidelines based on root cause methodology. It should also specify the thresholds, in scope and scale of impact, for operational decision making and the escalation path if those thresholds are met.

Transforming supply chains: Do you have the skills to accelerate your capabilities?

In addition to guidelines for decision making, the cross-functional team in charge of executing the plan needs autonomy to decide on a course of action for events outside the original plan, as well as the authority to see those actions implemented. Clear integration points between tactical execution and the IBP process protect the latter’s focus on midterm decision making and help tactical teams execute in response to immediate market needs.

An opportunity, but no ‘silver bullet’

With all the elements described above, IBP has a solid foundation to create value for a business. But IBP is no silver bullet. To achieve a top-performing supply chain combining timely and complete customer service with optimal cost and capital expenditures, companies also need mature planning and fulfillment processes using advanced systems and tools. That would include robust planning discipline and a collaboration culture covering all time horizons with appropriate processes while integrating commercial, planning, manufacturing, logistics, and sourcing organizations at all relevant levels.

As more companies implement advanced planning systems and nerve centers , the typical monthly IBP frequency might no longer be appropriate. Some companies may need to spend more time on short-term execution by increasing the frequency of planning and replanning. Others may be able to retain a quarterly IBP process, along with a robust autonomous-planning or exception engine. Already, advanced planning systems not only direct the valuable time of experts to the most critical demand and supply imbalances but also aggregate and disaggregate large volumes of data on the back end. These targeted reactions are part of a critical learning mechanism for the supply chain.

Over time, with root cause analyses and cross-functional collaboration on systemic fixes, the supply chain’s nerve center can get smarter at executing plans, separating noise from real issues, and proactively managing deviations. All this can eventually shorten IBP cycles, without the risk of overreacting to noise, and give P&L owners real-time transparency into how their decisions might affect performance.

P&L owners thinking about upgrading their S&OP or IBP processes can’t rely on textbook checklists. Instead, they can assume leadership of IBP and help their organizations turn strategies and plans into effective actions. To do so, they must sponsor IBP as a cross-functional driver of business decisions, fed by thoughtfully designed processes and aligned decision rights, as well as a performance management and capability-building system that encourages the right behavior and learning mechanisms across the organization. As integrated planning matures, supported by appropriate technology and maturing supply chain–management practices, it could shorten decision times and accelerate its impact on the business.

Elena Dumitrescu is a senior knowledge expert in McKinsey’s Toronto office, Matt Jochim is a partner in the London office, and Ali Sankur is a senior expert and associate partner in the Chicago office, where Ketan Shah is a partner.

Explore a career with us

Related articles.

To improve your supply chain, modernize your supply-chain IT

Supply-chain resilience: Is there a holy grail?

• Search Search Please fill out this field.

What Is the McKinsey 7S Model?

What are the key elements in the mckinsey 7s model.

• How Are the 7 S's Used in Strategic Planning?

What is McKinsey, and What Do They Do?

What are the 7s factors.

• Why Follow McKinsey's 7S Model?

The Bottom Line

• Business Essentials

How to Use the McKinsey 7-S Model for Strategic Planning

Investopedia / NoNo Flores

The McKinsey 7S Model is a framework for organizational effectiveness that postulates that there are seven internal factors of an organization that need to be aligned and reinforced in order for it to be successful.

Key Takeaways

• The McKinsey 7S Model is an organizational tool that assesses the well-being and future success of a company.
• It looks to seven internal factors of an organization as a means of determining whether a company has the structural support to be successful.
• The model comprises a mix of hard elements, which are clear-cut and influenced by management, and soft elements, which are influenced by corporate culture.

The 7S Model specifies seven factors that are classified as "hard" and "soft" elements. Hard elements are easily identified and influenced by management, while soft elements are more intangible, and influenced by  corporate culture . The hard elements are as follows:

The soft elements are as follows:

• Shared values

The framework is used as a strategic planning tool by organizations to show how seemingly disparate aspects of a company are, in fact, interrelated and reliant upon one another to achieve overall success.

Consultants Thomas Peters and Robert Waterman Jr., authors of the management bestseller "In Search Of Excellence," conceived of the McKinsey 7S Model at consulting firm McKinsey & Co. in the late 1970s.

How Are the 7 S's Used in Strategic Planning?

Below, we take a closer look at each element in the 7S Model:

• The strategy is the plan deployed by an organization in order to remain competitive in its industry and market. An ideal approach is to establish a long-term strategy that aligns with the other elements of the model and clearly communicates what the organization’s objective and goals are.
• The structure of the organization is made up of its corporate hierarchy , the chain of command, and divisional makeup that outlines how the operations function and interconnect. In effect, it details the management configuration and responsibilities of workers.
• Systems of the company refer to the daily procedures, workflow, and decisions that make up the standard operations within the organization.
• Shared values are the commonly accepted standards and norms within the company that both influence and temper the behavior of the entire staff and management. This may be detailed in company guidelines presented to the staff. In practice, shared values relate to the actual accepted behavior within the workplace.
• Skills comprise the talents and capabilities of the organization’s staff and management, which can determine the types of achievements and work the company can accomplish. There may come a time when a company assesses its available skills and decides it must make changes in order to achieve the goals set forth in its strategy.
• Style speaks to the example and approach that management takes in leading the company, as well as how this influences performance, productivity, and corporate culture.
• Staff refers to the personnel of the company, how large the workforce is, where their motivations reside, as well as how they are trained and prepared to accomplish the tasks set before them.

The McKinsey 7-S Model is applicable in a wide variety of situations where it's useful to understand how the various parts of an organization work together. It can be used as a tool to make decisions on future corporate strategy.

The framework can also be used to examine the likely effects of future changes in the organization or to align departments and processes during a merger or acquisition. Elements of the McKinsey Model 7s can also be used with individual teams or projects.

McKinsey & Co. is a global consulting and accounting firm founded by University of Chicago management professor James O. McKinsey in 1926. The firm specializes in management consulting for a wide range of corporations, governments, and other organizations.

The seven factors in McKinsey's model are strategy, structure, systems, shared values, skills, style, and staff.

Why Follow McKinsey's 7S Model?

Among the primary reasons corporate management uses McKinsey's 7S Model is to identify where a company excels and where it needs more work in creating an optimal and efficient workforce. Additionally, it used to evaluate the performance of a company following a merger or other restructuring to identify areas in the business that need greater improvement and alignment. In many ways, it allows organizations to target problems and set a course of action to implement change.

The McKinsey 7S Model is a framework for optimizing organizational design through analyzing seven core elements: strategy, structure, systems, shared values, skills, style, and staff. As a widely-used strategic planning tool, it allows organizations to function more effectively through aligning each of these elements in order to achieve its goals and objectives.

McKinsey. " Enduring Ideas: The 7-S Framework ."

• Terms of Service
• Editorial Policy
• Privacy Policy
• Your Privacy Choices

The Business Analyst Toolbox

A Deep Dive into the McKinsey 7-S Model

McKinsey 7-S Model guides strategic success via holistic organizational alignment and adaptability.

Navigating Business Excellence through Strategy, Structure, and Systems

In the ever-evolving landscape of business, achieving organizational success requires a strategic approach that goes beyond surface-level solutions. The McKinsey 7-S Model stands as a beacon, guiding leaders through a holistic framework designed to align and optimize key elements within an organization. In this article, we delve into the intricacies of the McKinsey 7-S Model, exploring how it can be a transformative force in shaping strategy, structure, and systems for enduring success.

• Table of content

Key Takeaways

About the mckinsey 7-s model, why using the mckinsey 7-s model, step 1: define and refine your strategy, step 2: assess and adapt organizational structure, step 3: audit and enhance systems and processes, step 4: cultivate leadership style in line with strategy, step 5: ensure staff alignment and skill development, step 6: reinforce shared values and organizational culture, step 7: regularly review and adapt, pros and cons, alternatives.

• Gain insights into the McKinsey 7-S Model and its relevance in modern business environments.
• Understand the interconnectedness of strategy, structure, systems, style, staff, skills, and shared values within the model.
• Learn practical applications and real-world examples showcasing the successful implementation of the McKinsey 7-S Model.
• Discover how this framework can enhance organizational effectiveness and adaptability.

The McKinsey 7-S Model, developed by consulting firm McKinsey & Company, is a powerful framework designed to enhance organizational effectiveness and align key components for strategic success. At its core, the model asserts that for an organization to perform at its best, seven critical elements must be in harmony and mutually reinforcing. These elements, often referred to as the “hard” and “soft” aspects of an organization, collectively create a holistic approach to managing and optimizing organizational performance.

• Strategy: The first pillar of the McKinsey 7-S Model is Strategy, emphasizing the need for a clear and well-defined approach to achieving organizational goals. This involves making informed choices about where the organization competes, how it differentiates itself, and the pathways it takes to succeed in the chosen markets.
• Structure: Structure addresses the organization’s overall design, including its hierarchy, reporting lines, and how various units or departments are arranged. This element recognizes that an effective structure aligns with and supports the chosen strategy, ensuring seamless coordination and efficient communication throughout the organization.
• Systems: Systems in the McKinsey 7-S Model encompass the formal and informal processes and procedures that facilitate the execution of the organization’s strategy. This includes decision-making protocols, information flow mechanisms, and any established routines that contribute to the overall functioning of the organization. A well-designed system ensures that the strategy is not only formulated but effectively implemented.
• Style: Leadership style is a critical element in shaping organizational culture and success. The Style component of the model emphasizes the importance of leadership behaviors that align with the chosen strategy. It encourages leaders to embody a style that motivates and engages the workforce, fostering an environment conducive to achieving strategic objectives.
• Staff: Staff represents the human resources within the organization, acknowledging the significance of having the right people with the right skills. This element recognizes that the workforce plays a pivotal role in executing the strategy and achieving organizational goals. Ensuring that the organization has individuals with the necessary skills and capabilities is fundamental to success.
• Skills: Complementary to the Staff element, Skills delve into the competencies and capabilities required to implement the chosen strategy. This involves assessing both individual and collective skill sets within the organization, identifying areas for development, and ensuring that the workforce possesses the skills needed for effective strategy execution.
• Shared Values: Often considered the “glue” that holds the organization together, Shared Values encapsulate the core beliefs and principles that guide decision-making and behavior. Aligning these shared values with the overall strategy ensures a cohesive and unified organizational culture, creating a strong foundation for sustained success.

By comprehensively addressing these seven interconnected elements, the McKinsey 7-S Model provides leaders with a structured framework to assess, align, and optimize their organizations, ultimately steering them toward excellence and strategic accomplishment.

In the dynamic landscape of modern business, the McKinsey 7-S Model stands out as a transformative tool, offering profound insights and strategic guidance for organizations aiming to thrive in a competitive environment. The utilization of this framework is underpinned by several compelling reasons, making it an invaluable asset for leaders committed to achieving organizational excellence.

• Holistic Alignment: One of the key strengths of the McKinsey 7-S Model is its holistic approach to organizational dynamics. By addressing seven interrelated elements simultaneously, the model ensures a comprehensive alignment of strategy, structure, systems, style, staff, skills, and shared values. This holistic alignment minimizes the risk of missteps and fosters a cohesive organizational environment where every facet works in synergy to achieve common objectives.
• Interconnected Elements: The interconnectedness of the seven elements in the model reflects the recognition that no aspect of an organization operates in isolation. Strategy, for example, must align with the organization’s structure, and both must be supported by the right staff, skills, and shared values. By acknowledging these interdependencies, the McKinsey 7-S Model provides a nuanced understanding of how each element influences and shapes the others, fostering a more integrated and strategic approach to management.
• Adaptability and Change Management: In a business landscape marked by rapid change, the McKinsey 7-S Model excels as a change management tool. Its structured framework allows organizations to assess their current state and strategize the necessary adjustments for future success. When faced with changes in the external environment, such as shifts in market conditions or technological advancements, the model empowers leaders to make informed decisions about how to adapt their strategy, structure, and other elements for continued relevance and competitiveness.
• Strategic Diagnosis and Implementation: The model’s utility extends beyond analysis; it serves as a practical guide for implementing strategic initiatives. Leaders can leverage the insights gained from assessing the seven elements to inform decision-making, set priorities, and allocate resources effectively. Whether entering new markets, restructuring teams, or fostering a new organizational culture, the McKinsey 7-S Model provides a roadmap for strategic diagnosis and successful implementation.
• Enhanced Communication and Collaboration: By emphasizing the importance of shared values, style, and effective communication systems, the model fosters a workplace culture conducive to collaboration and innovation. When every element is aligned with the strategic goals, it facilitates smoother communication channels and enhances collaboration among teams. This collaborative environment is crucial for adapting to changes, solving complex problems, and driving continuous improvement.

In conclusion, the McKinsey 7-S Model is not merely a diagnostic tool but a strategic compass that empowers organizations to navigate the complexities of the business landscape. Its holistic perspective, attention to interconnections, adaptability, and practical application make it an indispensable resource for leaders seeking to cultivate resilience, agility, and sustained success within their organizations.

Using the McKinsey 7-S Model – Step by Step

Embarking on the journey of organizational optimization with the McKinsey 7-S Model requires a systematic approach. This step-by-step guide elucidates how leaders can effectively utilize the framework to align and propel their organizations toward strategic excellence. Each step integrates the seven key elements, ensuring a comprehensive and cohesive application of the McKinsey 7-S Model.

• Begin by clearly articulating your organization’s strategy. Identify your market positioning, competitive advantage, and overall business goals. Utilize the ‘Strategy’ element of the McKinsey 7-S Model to evaluate and refine your strategic approach. Ensure that your chosen strategy aligns with the core values and long-term objectives of your organization.
• Evaluate your current organizational structure to determine its alignment with the chosen strategy. Use the ‘Structure’ element of the model to scrutinize the hierarchy, reporting lines, and overall design. Make adjustments to the structure as needed, ensuring it supports the strategic direction and facilitates efficient communication and decision-making.
• Examine the formal and informal systems and processes within your organization. Evaluate how these facilitate the execution of your strategy. Leverage the ‘Systems’ element of the McKinsey 7-S Model to identify areas for improvement or optimization. Implement changes that enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of your systems, ensuring they align with the overarching strategy.
• Assess the leadership style within your organization and evaluate its compatibility with the chosen strategy. Utilize the ‘Style’ element of the model to align leadership behaviors with strategic objectives. Foster a leadership culture that motivates and engages employees, creating an environment conducive to the successful implementation of the strategy.
• Evaluate the composition of your workforce and assess whether it aligns with the skills required for strategy execution. Utilize the ‘Staff’ and ‘Skills’ elements of the McKinsey 7-S Model to identify gaps and areas for improvement. Implement training and development programs to ensure that your staff possesses the necessary skills to contribute to the strategic goals of the organization.
• Examine the shared values and beliefs that underpin your organization’s culture. Leverage the ‘Shared Values’ element of the model to reinforce alignment with the overall strategy. Communicate these values throughout the organization, fostering a cohesive culture that supports the strategic direction and encourages collective commitment to shared goals.
• Continuous improvement is key to organizational success. Regularly revisit and review the seven elements of the McKinsey 7-S Model. Assess the ongoing alignment of strategy, structure, systems, style, staff, skills, and shared values. Identify emerging challenges and opportunities, making proactive adjustments to ensure sustained alignment with your strategic objectives.

By systematically applying the McKinsey 7-S Model through these steps, organizations can cultivate a dynamic and responsive environment that maximizes their strategic potential. This iterative process ensures ongoing adaptability, setting the stage for enduring success in an ever-evolving business landscape.

The McKinsey 7-S Model serves as a powerful compass for organizations navigating the complexities of strategic management. However, like any tool, it comes with its own set of advantages and limitations. Understanding the pros and cons is crucial for leaders looking to harness the full potential of this framework while being mindful of its inherent challenges.

• Holistic Approach: The model provides a comprehensive and holistic view of an organization, considering multiple interrelated elements simultaneously. This approach ensures that strategic decisions are not made in isolation but are aligned with various aspects of the business.
• Interconnected Analysis: By emphasizing the interconnectedness of strategy, structure, systems, style, staff, skills, and shared values, the model promotes a nuanced understanding of organizational dynamics. This interconnected analysis fosters a more integrated and synergistic approach to strategic management.
• Change Management Tool: The McKinsey 7-S Model is a potent tool for change management. Its structured framework allows organizations to assess their current state, identify areas for improvement, and make informed decisions about changes needed to align with strategic goals.
• Adaptability: The model’s flexibility makes it adaptable to various industries, organizational sizes, and types. Whether applied to large corporations or small businesses, the McKinsey 7-S Model can be tailored to suit the unique needs and contexts of different organizations.
• Enhanced Communication: By emphasizing shared values and effective communication systems, the model contributes to a collaborative organizational culture. This fosters improved communication channels, teamwork, and a sense of shared purpose among employees.
• Complexity and Time-Consuming: The comprehensive nature of the model can be both an asset and a drawback. Conducting a thorough analysis of all seven elements requires time and resources, potentially making it impractical for organizations with tight schedules or limited resources.
• Subjectivity in Assessment: The interpretation of elements like style, shared values, and even strategy can be subjective, leading to varied assessments by different individuals. This subjectivity can introduce bias and limit the objectivity of the analysis.
• Limited Emphasis on External Factors: The model primarily focuses on internal aspects of an organization, potentially overlooking external factors such as market conditions, industry trends, or regulatory changes. Organizations must supplement the McKinsey 7-S Model with additional tools to address external influences adequately.
• Static Nature: The model may not adequately capture the dynamic nature of some organizations. In rapidly changing industries or environments, the static nature of the model might hinder its effectiveness in providing real-time insights.
• Overemphasis on Shared Values: While shared values are crucial, overemphasizing them may lead to a homogenized organizational culture, potentially stifling diversity of thought and creativity. Striking the right balance is essential to foster a culture that encourages innovation.

Understanding these pros and cons equips leaders with the knowledge to leverage the McKinsey 7-S Model effectively while being aware of its limitations. With thoughtful application and consideration of contextual factors, organizations can harness the model’s strengths to drive strategic success.

While the McKinsey 7-S Model offers a robust framework for strategic analysis and organizational alignment, it’s essential to recognize that various alternative frameworks exist, each with its unique strengths and focuses. Leaders seeking a comprehensive strategic toolkit can explore these alternatives to find the approach that best suits their organizational needs.

• SWOT Analysis: SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) is a widely-used framework that assesses an organization’s internal strengths and weaknesses, along with external opportunities and threats. It provides a concise snapshot of the current strategic position and aids in strategic planning.
• Balanced Scorecard: The Balanced Scorecard translates an organization’s strategy into a set of performance metrics. It includes financial and non-financial indicators, offering a balanced view that aligns strategic objectives with key performance indicators (KPIs).
• PESTLE Analysis: PESTLE (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, Environmental) is an external analysis framework. It examines the macro-environmental factors that can impact an organization, helping leaders anticipate and respond to external influences.
• Porter’s Five Forces: Developed by Michael Porter, this model assesses the competitive forces within an industry, including the threat of new entrants, bargaining power of buyers and suppliers, threat of substitutes, and competitive rivalry. It helps organizations understand the broader competitive landscape.
• McKinsey 9-Box Matrix: This matrix evaluates the performance and potential of employees within an organization. It is often used for talent management and succession planning, helping identify high-potential individuals and key development areas.
• Blue Ocean Strategy: Blue Ocean Strategy encourages organizations to create uncontested market space by innovating and finding new, untapped opportunities. It contrasts with Red Ocean, where competition is fierce, and focuses on value innovation.
• Ansoff Matrix: This matrix helps organizations explore growth strategies by considering products and markets. It categorizes strategies into market penetration, market development, product development, and diversification.
• Kano Model: The Kano Model categorizes customer preferences into basic needs, performance needs, and delighters. It aids in understanding customer satisfaction and prioritizing features or services.
• Scenario Planning: Unlike traditional forecasting, scenario planning involves creating multiple plausible future scenarios. It helps organizations prepare for a range of potential futures and make strategic decisions that are robust across different situations.
• OKR (Objectives and Key Results): OKR is a goal-setting framework that aligns organizational objectives with key measurable results. It promotes transparency, focus, and agility in achieving strategic goals.

Exploring these alternatives alongside the McKinsey 7-S Model enables leaders to tailor their strategic approach to the unique challenges and objectives of their organization. Each framework brings its own perspective, contributing to a comprehensive strategic toolkit for informed decision-making.

In the dynamic realm of business management, the McKinsey 7-S Model emerges as a guiding compass, directing leaders toward a holistic understanding of their organizations. The model’s emphasis on the interconnected elements of strategy, structure, systems, style, staff, skills, and shared values offers a nuanced framework for achieving enduring success. As we’ve explored the step-by-step application and weighed the pros and cons, it becomes evident that the McKinsey 7-S Model is a potent tool, promoting adaptability, change management, and enhanced organizational communication.

However, strategic excellence requires a multifaceted approach, acknowledging the diversity of organizational challenges. As alternatives to the McKinsey 7-S Model populate the strategic toolkit, each framework contributes a unique perspective. Whether it’s the comprehensive SWOT Analysis, the external insights from PESTLE, or the employee-centric McKinsey 9-Box Matrix, leaders can choose frameworks that align with their specific needs.

As we conclude this exploration, it’s essential to recognize that no single model fits all scenarios. Instead, a strategic leader’s prowess lies in the ability to discern when to deploy the McKinsey 7-S Model and when to leverage alternative frameworks. A balanced approach, considering the organization’s context, goals, and external environment, ensures a comprehensive and adaptive strategic journey.

In the ever-evolving landscape of business strategy, versatility becomes the cornerstone of success. By embracing the strengths of the McKinsey 7-S Model and integrating diverse frameworks into their strategic repertoire, leaders can navigate the complexities, steer their organizations toward excellence, and thrive in an environment marked by continuous change and innovation.

McKinsey 7-S Model, strategic excellence, holistic framework, strategy, structure, systems, style, staff, skills, shared values, alternatives, SWOT Analysis, Balanced Scorecard, PESTLE Analysis, Porter’s Five Forces, McKinsey 9-Box Matrix, Blue Ocean Strategy, Ansoff Matrix, Kano Model, scenario planning, OKR

Share this:

Top 10 Project Management Tools

Top 8 Requirements Management Tools

Top 10 Task Management Tools

Top 10 Financial Analysis tools

• Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
• Subscribe Subscribed
• Copy shortlink
• Report this content
• View post in Reader
• Manage subscriptions
• Collapse this bar

Strategy Frameworks for Business Designers - McKinsey 7s Explained

Discover the key elements of the McKinsey 7s framework and unlock the strategic insights needed to drive business success.

Understanding the Importance of Strategy Frameworks

In today's rapidly evolving business environment, having a clear and coherent strategy is essential. Strategy frameworks serve as powerful tools that enable business designers to identify opportunities, analyze challenges, and make informed decisions. By providing a structured approach to strategic planning , these frameworks help organizations align their goals, resources, and capabilities to achieve long-term success.

When it comes to developing a successful strategy, it is important to understand the role that strategy frameworks play in business design . These frameworks provide a roadmap for businesses to assess their current state, identify areas for improvement, and develop a comprehensive strategy to achieve their goals. By breaking down complex concepts into manageable components, these frameworks enable business designers to develop actionable plans and guide the organization towards success.

The Role of Strategy Frameworks in Business Design

Strategy frameworks play a crucial role in the field of business design. They provide a framework for businesses to assess their current state, identify areas for improvement, and develop a comprehensive strategy to achieve their goals. By breaking down complex concepts into manageable components, these frameworks enable business designers to develop actionable plans and guide the organization towards success.

Business design is a multidisciplinary approach that combines elements of strategy, innovation, and organizational design to create a holistic view of the organization. It involves understanding the needs and expectations of customers , analyzing market trends, and aligning the organization's resources and capabilities to meet those needs. Strategy frameworks provide a structured approach to this process, helping businesses identify their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, and develop strategies to address them.

One of the key benefits of using strategy frameworks in business design is that they provide a common language and framework for communication. By using a standardized approach, organizations can ensure that everyone is on the same page and working towards the same goals. This helps to align efforts, reduce confusion, and increase the likelihood of success.

Key Components of Effective Strategy Frameworks

Effective strategy frameworks consist of several key components that work together to provide a holistic view of the organization. These components include:

• Vision and mission statements: These statements define the purpose and direction of the organization. They provide a clear and compelling vision of what the organization aspires to be and guide decision-making.
• Environmental analysis: This component involves understanding the external factors that impact the business, such as market trends, competitive landscape, and regulatory environment. It helps businesses identify opportunities and threats and develop strategies to navigate the external environment.
• Internal analysis: This component involves evaluating the organization's strengths, weaknesses, and capabilities. It helps businesses identify their core competencies and areas for improvement, and develop strategies to leverage their strengths and address their weaknesses.
• Strategic objectives and goals: These components outline the desired outcomes that the organization aims to achieve. They provide a clear direction for the organization and help guide decision-making.
• Action plans and initiatives: These components outline the specific actions and initiatives that the organization will undertake to achieve its strategic objectives and goals. They provide a roadmap for implementation and help ensure that the strategy is executed effectively.
• Monitoring and evaluation methods: These components involve assessing progress towards strategic objectives and goals, and making necessary adjustments. They help organizations track their performance, identify areas for improvement, and ensure that the strategy remains relevant and effective.
• Communication and engagement strategies: These components involve communicating the strategy to stakeholders and ensuring alignment throughout the organization. They help create a shared understanding of the strategy and foster a sense of ownership and commitment among employees.

By incorporating these key components into their strategy frameworks, organizations can develop a comprehensive and effective strategy that aligns their goals, resources, and capabilities, and positions them for long-term success.

Introduction to McKinsey 7s Framework

Developed by the renowned management consulting firm McKinsey & Company, the McKinsey 7s Framework is a popular strategy tool that provides a comprehensive approach to organizational effectiveness. It emphasizes the interdependence and alignment of seven critical elements within an organization to achieve optimal performance.

Origins and Evolution of McKinsey 7s

The McKinsey 7s Framework was developed in the late 1970s as a collaboration between Tom Peters, Robert H. Waterman Jr., and Richard Pascale. It was originally designed to help organizations analyze and improve their internal alignment. Over the years, the framework has evolved to incorporate new perspectives and adapt to the changing business landscape, making it a valuable tool for business designers.

Overview of the 7 Elements in McKinsey 7s

The McKinsey 7s Framework consists of seven interconnected elements that encompass various aspects of an organization:

• Strategy: the plan of action to achieve the organization's goals and objectives.
• Structure: the organizational layout, including reporting lines and division of labor.
• Systems: the daily processes and procedures that govern how work is done.
• Shared Values: the core beliefs, principles, and culture that shape the organization's identity.
• Skills: the capabilities and competencies of the organization's workforce.
• Style: the leadership approach and management style within the organization.
• Staff: the human resources aspect, including recruitment, development, and retention of talent.

Let's dive deeper into each of these elements to gain a better understanding of their significance:

1. Strategy

The strategy element of the McKinsey 7s Framework focuses on the plan of action that an organization adopts to achieve its goals and objectives. It involves making decisions about the direction the organization should take, the markets it should target, and the resources it should allocate to achieve its desired outcomes.

Developing a clear and well-defined strategy is crucial for organizations as it provides a roadmap for success and helps align all other elements of the framework.

2. Structure

The structure element of the framework refers to the organizational layout, including reporting lines, division of labor, and the overall hierarchy within the organization. It determines how authority and decision-making flow through the organization.

An effective organizational structure ensures that roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, promotes efficient communication and collaboration, and enables the organization to adapt to changes in the business environment.

The systems element focuses on the daily processes and procedures that govern how work is done within the organization. It includes both formal systems, such as performance management and information technology, as well as informal systems, such as communication channels and decision-making processes.

An organization's systems play a crucial role in ensuring that work is carried out effectively and efficiently. Well-designed systems promote productivity, facilitate knowledge sharing, and enable the organization to respond quickly to challenges and opportunities.

4. Shared Values

The shared values element represents the core beliefs, principles, and culture that shape the organization's identity. It encompasses the organization's mission, vision, and values, as well as the norms and behaviors exhibited by its members.

Shared values are the foundation of an organization's culture and guide decision-making, behavior, and interactions within the organization. They create a sense of identity and purpose, fostering a cohesive and aligned workforce.

The skills element focuses on the capabilities and competencies of the organization's workforce. It includes both technical skills, such as expertise in specific domains, and soft skills, such as communication, leadership, and problem-solving abilities.

An organization's skills are a critical asset that enables it to execute its strategy and deliver value to its stakeholders. Developing and maintaining a skilled workforce is essential for long-term success and competitiveness.

The style element refers to the leadership approach and management style within the organization. It encompasses the behavior and attitudes of leaders and managers, as well as the overall organizational climate.

The leadership style adopted within an organization has a significant impact on its culture, employee engagement, and overall performance. Effective leaders inspire and motivate their teams, foster innovation, and create a positive work environment.

The staff element focuses on the human resources aspect of the organization, including recruitment, development, and retention of talent. It encompasses the skills, knowledge, and experience of the workforce, as well as their alignment with the organization's values and culture.

Having the right people in the right roles is crucial for organizational success. Investing in attracting, developing, and retaining top talent ensures that the organization has the capabilities and expertise needed to achieve its strategic objectives.

By considering and aligning these seven elements, organizations can enhance their overall effectiveness and improve their ability to navigate the complexities of the business landscape.

Diving Deeper into the 7s of McKinsey Framework

Now that we have a basic understanding of the seven elements in the McKinsey 7s Framework, let's explore each element in detail and uncover their significance in driving organizational performance.

Strategy - The Plan of Action

At the heart of the McKinsey 7s Framework lies strategy, which outlines the organization's overarching plan of action. A well-defined strategy provides a clear direction and helps align all other elements to achieve desired outcomes. It involves making choices about where to compete, how to differentiate, and which opportunities to pursue.

Structure - The Organizational Layout

The structure of an organization refers to its formal framework, including reporting lines, hierarchies, and divisions. It defines how people and resources are organized to achieve strategic objectives. A well-designed structure facilitates effective communication, collaboration, and decision-making, ensuring that the organization operates efficiently and adapts to changing market conditions.

Systems - The Daily Processes and Procedures

Systems encompass the various processes, procedures, and routines that govern how work is accomplished within the organization. Effective systems enable efficient operations, minimize errors or bottlenecks, and promote the timely delivery of products and services. Aligning systems with the overall strategy ensures that workflows are optimized and tasks are performed consistently.

Shared Values - The Core of the Organization

Shared values refer to the beliefs, principles, and culture that shape the organization's identity. They serve as guiding principles that influence decision-making, behavior, and interactions within the organization. Strong shared values foster a sense of unity, purpose, and commitment among employees, creating a cohesive organizational culture that drives performance.

Skills - The Capabilities of the Team

The skills element focuses on the organization's capabilities, both at an individual and collective level. It encompasses the skills, knowledge, expertise, and competencies required to perform tasks effectively. Developing and nurturing the right skills ensures that the organization is equipped to tackle challenges, exploit opportunities, and stay ahead in a rapidly changing business landscape.

Style - The Leadership Approach

The leadership style within an organization greatly influences the overall culture, decision-making, and employee behavior. Leaders shape the organization's values, set expectations, and create an environment where employees can thrive. Aligning the leadership style with the desired organizational outcomes fosters a positive work environment and enables effective execution of the strategy.

Staff - The Human Resources Aspect

Staff refers to the human resources aspect of the organization, encompassing recruitment, development, and retention of talent. Having the right people with the right skills and cultural fit is crucial for achieving organizational goals. Effective staff management ensures that the organization has the necessary resources to implement the strategy and respond to changing market dynamics.

The Interconnectivity of the 7s in McKinsey Framework

The effectiveness of the McKinsey 7s Framework lies in the interconnectivity and alignment of its seven elements. Each element has a direct or indirect impact on the others, and changes in one element can ripple through the entire organization.

How the 7s Influence Each Other

For example, a change in strategy may require a corresponding shift in structure to support its implementation. Similarly, a shift in leadership style can influence the organization's culture and shared values. By understanding and managing these interdependencies, business designers can optimize the performance of their organizations and drive sustainable success.

Balancing the 7s for Optimal Performance

Achieving optimal performance requires a delicate balance between the seven elements of the McKinsey 7s Framework. Each element must be in sync with the others to create a harmonious and effective organizational ecosystem. Continuous monitoring, evaluation, and adaptation are essential to ensure that the seven elements remain aligned and responsive to the ever-changing business landscape.

In conclusion, strategy frameworks provide business designers with a structured approach to strategic planning, enabling organizations to navigate the complexities of the business world. The McKinsey 7s Framework, with its seven interconnected elements, offers a comprehensive model for driving organizational effectiveness and performance. By understanding the importance of strategy frameworks, exploring the key components of effective frameworks, and diving deeper into the 7s of the McKinsey Framework, business designers can leverage these tools to develop strategies that propel their organizations towards success.

Helping designers and strategists turn their boldest ideas into market-leading ventures through Business, Design and Growth.

Special Offer! $197 Just $47

The Leading Source of Insights On Business Model Strategy & Tech Business Models

McKinsey Business Model

The McKinsey Business Model emphasizes delivering high-value consulting services to clients worldwide. It focuses on providing strategic insights, data-driven solutions, and expertise in various industries. With a strong operational foundation, diverse client base, and strategic partnerships, McKinsey generates revenue through consulting fees, driving its success in the industry.

Table of Contents

Value Proposition:

• Strategic Insights: McKinsey’s core value proposition lies in its ability to provide clients with strategic insights that enable them to navigate complex business challenges. Through extensive research, data analysis , and industry expertise, McKinsey offers clients a deep understanding of their market landscape, competitive positioning, and growth opportunities.
• Industry Expertise: McKinsey’s consultants are experts in various industries, allowing them to offer tailored solutions that address the unique challenges and opportunities specific to each sector. This industry specialization enables McKinsey to provide relevant and effective recommendations to clients across diverse fields.
• High-Value Consulting: McKinsey’s consulting services are known for their high value . Clients seek McKinsey’s assistance when facing critical decisions that can significantly impact their business outcomes. McKinsey’s reputation for delivering tangible results and driving organizational transformation positions it as a top-tier consulting firm.

Operational Model:

• Global Presence: McKinsey’s extensive network of offices around the world allows the firm to serve clients on a global scale . This presence enables McKinsey to understand regional nuances, regulatory environments, and market trends that affect clients’ businesses in different regions.
• Diverse Client Base: McKinsey serves a diverse range of clients, including corporations, government agencies, non-profit organizations, and high net worth individuals. This diversity allows McKinsey to accumulate a wealth of cross-industry knowledge and insights, which can be applied to address various client needs .
• Strategic Partnerships: McKinsey collaborates with strategic partners, such as technology providers, industry associations, and academic institutions. These partnerships enhance McKinsey’s capabilities, giving them access to cutting-edge tools, industry trends, and research-driven insights that enrich their consulting services.

Revenue Model:

• Consulting Fees: McKinsey generates its primary revenue through consulting fees charged to clients for its advisory and consulting services. These fees are often premium due to the firm’s reputation for delivering high-quality, actionable recommendations and strategies.
• High-Value Proposition: The depth of expertise, insights, and actionable strategies that McKinsey provides justifies the premium consulting fees it charges. Clients view McKinsey’s services as investments that can lead to significant improvements in their business performance and competitive advantage.

Distribution Strategy:

• Direct Client Engagement: McKinsey’s consultants directly engage with clients through one-on-one consultations. These consultations involve in-depth discussions to understand clients’ specific challenges, goals, and needs , enabling McKinsey to tailor its services accordingly.
• Global Network: McKinsey maintains a vast network of offices and professionals across the globe. This extensive presence allows the firm to serve clients in various geographic regions, providing localized insights and recommendations that consider regional nuances and market dynamics.
• Industry Specialization: McKinsey organizes its professionals into industry-focused teams. These teams possess expertise in specific sectors, such as healthcare, finance, or technology. Industry specialization ensures that clients receive tailored solutions relevant to their business context.
• Strategic Partnerships: McKinsey collaborates with strategic partners, including technology providers, industry associations, and academic institutions. These partnerships enhance the firm’s capabilities, enabling access to cutting-edge tools, industry trends, and research-driven insights that enrich its consulting services.
• Digital Engagement: In recent years, McKinsey has increasingly leveraged digital platforms and technology to engage with clients remotely, share insights, and deliver services efficiently, especially in the wake of global events like the COVID-19 pandemic.

Marketing Strategy:

• Brand Reputation: McKinsey has cultivated a strong and prestigious brand reputation over decades. Its brand is synonymous with high-quality strategic consulting, which attracts clients seeking trusted advisors for critical business decisions.
• Thought Leadership: McKinsey actively produces thought leadership content, including research reports, whitepapers, and articles. These resources are made available to clients and the broader public through McKinsey’s website and publications. Thought leadership establishes the firm’s expertise and showcases its capabilities.
• Client Engagement: McKinsey places significant emphasis on building and maintaining long-term client relationships. Repeat engagements and referrals from satisfied clients play a vital role in the firm’s growth and sustainability.
• Digital Presence: McKinsey maintains a strong digital presence through its website, where clients and the public can access a wealth of industry insights, reports, and articles. McKinsey also uses digital platforms for client interactions and sharing deliverables.

Organizational Structure:

• Board of Directors: McKinsey is governed by a board of directors responsible for overseeing the firm’s strategic decisions, governance, and financial performance.
• Executive Leadership: The executive leadership team, led by the global managing partner and senior partners, manages the firm’s operations, client engagements, and strategic direction.
• Service Line Divisions: McKinsey organizes its professionals into service line divisions, each specializing in areas such as Strategy & Corporate Finance, Operations, Marketing & Sales, and more. These divisions deliver specialized consulting services.
• Industry Practices: McKinsey further specializes its professionals into industry practices. These practices focus on specific sectors, such as automotive, energy, or retail, allowing McKinsey to provide industry-relevant solutions to clients.
• Global Network: McKinsey’s global network comprises numerous offices and branches worldwide. This network ensures that the firm can provide localized services, industry insights, and regulatory expertise tailored to different regions and markets.

Key Takeaways

• In summary, McKinsey’s business model revolves around offering unparalleled strategic insights, industry expertise, and high-value consulting services to clients worldwide.
• This model is supported by a global operational presence, a diverse client portfolio, and strategic collaborations that enable the firm to maintain its position as a leader in the consulting industry.

McKinsey’s Related Frameworks

GE McKinsey

McKinsey Horizon Model

McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom

Minto Pyramid

McKinsey Organizational Structure

Connected Business Frameworks

• Porter’s Five Forces

SWOT Analysis

Balanced Scorecard

Blue Ocean Strategy 

GAP Analysis

Scenario Planning

Read also :  Business Strategy, Examples, Case Studies, And Tools

Connected resources:

• Ansoff Matrix
• Business Strategy Frameworks
• Blue Ocean Strategy
• Competitive Moat
• Profit Margins

Additional resources:

• Business Models
• Business Strategy
• Digital Business Models
• Distribution Channels
• Go-To-Market Strategy
• Marketing Strategy
• Network Effects
• Platform Business Models
• Revenue Models

More Resources

About The Author

Gennaro Cuofano

Discover more from fourweekmba.

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Type your email…

Continue reading