No internet connection.

All search filters on the page have been cleared., your search has been saved..

  • Sign in to my profile My Profile

Not Logged In

Reader's guide

Entries a-z, subject index.

  • Self-Presentation
  • Edited by: Roy F. Baumeister & Kathleen D. Vohs
  • In: Encyclopedia of Social Psychology
  • Chapter DOI: https:// doi. org/10.4135/9781412956253.n494
  • Subject: Social Psychology (general)
  • Keywords: impression management ; self-presentation
  • Show page numbers Hide page numbers

Self-presentation refers to how people attempt to present themselves to control or shape how others (called the audience) view them. It involves expressing oneself and behaving in ways that create a desired impression. Self-presentation is part of a broader set of behaviors called impression management. Impression management refers to the controlled presentation of information about all sorts of things, including information about other people or events. Self-presentation refers specifically to information about the self.

History and Modern Usage

Early work on impression management focused on its manipulative, inauthentic uses that might typify a used car salesperson who lies to sell a car, or someone at a job interview who embellishes accomplishments to get a job. However, researchers now think of selfpresentation more broadly as a pervasive aspect of [Page 836] life. Although some aspects of self-presentation are deliberate and effortful (and at times deceitful), other aspects are automatic and done with little or no conscious thought. For example, a woman may interact with many people during the day and may make different impressions on each person. When she starts her day at her apartment, she chats with her roommates and cleans up after breakfast, thereby presenting the image of being a good friend and responsible roommate. During classes, she responds to her professor's questions and carefully takes notes, presenting the image of being a good student. Later that day, she calls her parents and tells them about her classes and other activities (although likely leaving out information about some activities), presenting the image of being a loving and responsible daughter. That night, she might go to a party or dancing with friends, presenting the image of being fun and easygoing. Although some aspects of these self-presentations may be deliberate and conscious, other aspects are not. For example, chatting with her roommates and cleaning up after breakfast may be habitual behaviors that are done with little conscious thought. Likewise, she may automatically hold the door open for an acquaintance or buy a cup of coffee for a friend. These behaviors, although perhaps not done consciously or with self-presentation in mind, nevertheless convey an image of the self to others.

Although people have the ability to present images that are false, self-presentations are often genuine; they reflect an attempt by the person to have others perceive him or her accurately, or at least consistent with how the person perceives himself or herself. Self-presentations can vary as a function of the audience; people present different aspects of themselves to different audiences or under different conditions. A man likely presents different aspects of himself to his close friends than he does to his elderly grandmother, and a woman may present a different image to her spouse than she does to her employer. This is not to say that these different images are false. Rather, they represent different aspects of the self. The self is much like a gem with multiple facets. The gem likely appears differently depending on the angle at which it is viewed. However, the various appearances are all genuine. Even if people present a self-image that they know to be false, they may begin to internalize the self-image and thereby eventually come to believe the self-presentation. For example, a man may initially present an image of being a good student without believing it to be genuine, but after attending all his classes for several weeks, visiting the professor during office hours, and asking questions during class, he may come to see himself as truly being a good student. This internalization process is most likely to occur when people make a public commitment to the self-image, when the behavior is at least somewhat consistent with their self-image, and when they receive positive feedback or other rewards for presenting the self-image.

Self-presentation is often directed to external audiences such as friends, lovers, employers, teachers, children, and even strangers. Self-presentation is more likely to be conscious when the presenter depends on the audience for some reward, expects to interact with the audience in the future, wants something from the audience, or values the audience's approval. Yet self-presentation extends beyond audiences that are physically present to imagined audiences, and these imagined audiences can have distinct effects on behavior. A young man at a party might suddenly think about his parents and change his behavior from rambunctious to reserved. People sometimes even make self-presentations only for themselves. For instance, people want to claim certain identities, such as being fun, intelligent, kind, moral, and they may behave in line with these identities even in private.

Self-presentation is inherently goal-directed; people present certain images because they benefit from the images in some way. The most obvious benefits are interpersonal, arising from getting others to do what one wants. A job candidate may convey an image of being hardworking and dependable to get a job; a salesperson may convey an image of being trustworthy and honest to achieve a sale. People may also benefit from their self-presentations by gaining respect, power, liking, or other desirable social rewards. Finally, people make certain impressions on others to maintain a sense of who they are, or their self-concept. For example, a man who wants to think of himself as a voracious reader might join a book club or volunteer at a library, or a woman who wishes to perceive herself as generous may contribute lavishly to a charitable cause. Even when there are few or no obvious benefits of a particular self-presentation, people may simply present an image that is consistent with the way they like to think about themselves, or at least the way they are accustomed to thinking about themselves.

[Page 837] Much of self-presentation is directed toward achieving one of two desirable images. First, people want to appear likeable. People like others who are attractive, interesting, and fun to be with. Thus, a sizable proportion of self-presentation revolves around developing, maintaining, and enhancing appearance and conveying and emphasizing characteristics that others desire, admire, and enjoy. Second, people want to appear competent. People like others who are skilled and able, and thus another sizable proportion of self-presentation revolves around conveying an image of competence. Yet, self-presentation is not so much about presenting desirable images as it is about presenting desired images, and some desired images are not necessarily desirable. For example, schoolyard bullies may present an image of being dangerous or intimidating to gain or maintain power over others. Some people present themselves as weak or infirmed (or exaggerate their weaknesses) to gain help from others. For instance, a member of a group project may display incompetence in the hope that other members will do more of the work, or a child may exaggerate illness to avoid going to school.

People self-present in a variety of ways. Perhaps most obviously, people self-present in what they say. These verbalizations can be direct claims of a particular image, such as when a person claims to be altruistic. They also can be indirect, such as when a person discloses personal behaviors or standards (e.g., “I volunteer at a hospital”). Other verbal presentations emerge when people express attitudes or beliefs. Divulging that one enjoys backpacking through Europe conveys the image that one is a world-traveler. Second, people self-present nonverbally in their physical appearance, body language, and other behavior. Smiling, eye contact, and nods of agreement can convey a wealth of information. Third, people self-present through the props they surround themselves with and through their associations. Driving an expensive car or flying first class conveys an image of having wealth, whereas an array of diplomas and certificates on one's office walls conveys an image of education and expertise. Likewise, people judge others based on their associations. For example, being in the company of politicians or movie stars conveys an image of importance, and not surprisingly, many people display photographs of themselves with famous people. In a similar vein, high school students concerned with their status are often careful about which classmates they are seen and not seen with publicly. Being seen by others in the company of someone from a member of a disreputable group can raise questions about one's own social standing.

Self-presentation is most successful when the image presented is consistent with what the audience thinks or knows to be true. The more the image presented differs from the image believed or anticipated by the audience, the less willing the audience will be to accept the image. For example, the lower a student's grade is on the first exam, the more difficulty he or she will have in convincing a professor that he or she will earn an A on the next exam. Self-presentations are constrained by audience knowledge. The more the audience knows about a person, the less freedom the person has in claiming a particular identity. An audience that knows very little about a person will be more accepting of whatever identity the person conveys, whereas an audience that knows a great deal about a person will be less accepting.

People engaging in self-presentation sometimes encounter difficulties that undermine their ability to convey a desired image. First, people occasionally encounter the multiple audience problem , in which they must simultaneously present two conflicting images. For example, a student while walking with friends who know only her rebellious, impetuous side may run into her professor who knows only her serious, conscientious side. The student faces the dilemma of conveying the conflicting images of rebellious friend and serious student. When both audiences are present, the student must try to behave in a way that is consistent with how her friends view her, but also in a way that is consistent with how her professor views her. Second, people occasionally encounter challenges to their self-presentations. The audience may not believe the image the person presents. Challenges are most likely to arise when people are managing impressions through self-descriptions and the self-descriptions are inconsistent with other evidence. For example, a man who claims to be good driver faces a self-presentational dilemma if he is ticketed or gets in an automobile accident. Third, selfpresentations can fail when people lack the cognitive resources to present effectively because, for example, [Page 838] they are tired, anxious, or distracted. For instance, a woman may yawn uncontrollably or reflexively check her watch while talking to a boring classmate, unintentionally conveying an image of disinterest.

Some of the most important images for people to convey are also the hardest. As noted earlier, among the most important images people want to communicate are likeability and competence. Perhaps because these images are so important and are often rewarded, audiences may be skeptical of accepting direct claims of likeability and competence from presenters, thinking that the person is seeking personal gain. Thus, people must resort to indirect routes to create these images, and the indirect routes can be misinterpreted. For example, the student who sits in the front row of the class and asks a lot of questions may be trying to project an image of being a competent student but may be perceived negatively as a teacher's pet by fellow students.

Finally, there is a dark side to self-presentation. In some instances, the priority people place on their appearances or images can threaten their health. People who excessively tan are putting a higher priority on their appearance (e.g., being tan) than on their health (e.g., taking precautions to avoid skin cancer). Similarly, although condoms help protect against sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancy, self-presentational concerns may dissuade partners or potential partners from discussing, carrying, or using condoms. Women may fear that carrying condoms makes them seem promiscuous or easy, whereas men may fear that carrying condoms makes them seem presumptuous, as if they are expecting to have sex. Self-presentational concerns may also influence interactions with health care providers and may lead people to delay or avoid embarrassing medical tests and procedures or treatments for conditions that are embarrassing. For example, people may be reluctant to seek tests or treatment for sexually transmitted diseases, loss of bladder control, mental disorders, mental decline, or other conditions associated with weakness or incompetence. Finally, concerns with social acceptance may prompt young people to engage in risky behaviors such as excessive alcohol consumption, sexual promiscuity, or juvenile delinquency.

  • self-presentation
  • impression management
  • Deception (Lying)
  • Ego Depletion
  • Impression Management
  • Phenomenal Self
  • Self-Defeating Behaviors
  • Self-Perception Theory
  • Social Desirability Bias

Further Readings

  • Self-Promotion
  • Action Identification Theory
  • Adaptive Unconscious
  • Apparent Mental Causation
  • Approach-Avoidance Conflict
  • Authenticity
  • Auto-Motive Model
  • Behavioral Contagion
  • Choking Under Pressure
  • Controlled Processes
  • Decision Making
  • Delay of Gratification
  • Drive Theory
  • Excitation-Transfer Theory
  • Extrinsic Motivation
  • Feedback Loop
  • Free Will, Study of
  • Grim Necessities
  • Guilty Pleasures
  • Helplessness, Learned
  • Home-Field Advantage and Disadvantage
  • Hormones and Behavior
  • Implementation Intentions
  • Intrinsic Motivation
  • Ironic Processes
  • Learned Helplessness
  • Learning Theory
  • Locus of Control
  • Mental Control
  • Meta-Awareness
  • Mindfulness and Mindlessness
  • Modeling of Behavior
  • Nonconscious Processes
  • Overjustification Effect
  • Procrastination
  • Reasoned Action Theory
  • Regulatory Focus Theory
  • Risk Taking
  • Rubicon Model of Action Phases
  • Self-Awareness
  • Self-Control Measures
  • Self-Defeating Behavior
  • Self-Determination Theory
  • Self-Discrepancy Theory
  • Self-Efficacy
  • Self-Handicapping
  • Self-Regulation
  • Social Facilitation
  • Social Learning
  • Social Loafing
  • Stereotype Threat
  • Stress Appraisal Theory (Primary and Secondary Appraisal)
  • Temporal Construal Theory
  • Theory of Planned Behavior
  • Antisocial Behavior
  • Aversive Racism
  • Bobo Doll Studies
  • Catharsis of Aggression
  • Cheater-Detection Mechanism
  • Conflict Resolution
  • Displaced Aggression
  • Frustration–Aggression Hypothesis
  • GRIT Tension Reduction Strategy
  • Hostile Masculinity Syndrome
  • Intimate Partner Violence
  • Media Violence and Aggression
  • Milgram's Obedience to Authority Studies
  • Moral Hypocrisy
  • Narcissistic Reactance Theory of Sexual Coercion
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Social Exclusion
  • Stanford Prison Experiment
  • Terrorism, Psychology of
  • Threatened Egotism Theory of Aggression
  • Anticipatory Attitude Change
  • Attitude Change
  • Attitude Formation
  • Attitude Strength
  • Attitude–Behavior Consistency
  • Balance Theory
  • Brainwashing
  • Cognitive Consistency
  • Cognitive Dissonance Theory
  • Dual Attitudes
  • Effort Justification
  • Elaboration Likelihood Model
  • Forced Compliance Technique
  • Forewarning
  • Heuristic-Systematic Model of Persuasion
  • Implicit Attitudes
  • Motivated Reasoning
  • Polarization Processes
  • Satisficing
  • Collective Self
  • Collectivistic Cultures
  • Cultural Animal
  • Cultural Differences
  • Culture of Honor
  • Erotic Plasticity
  • Ethnocentrism
  • Independent Self-Construals
  • Interdependent Self-Construals
  • Moral Development
  • Mortality Salience
  • Objectification Theory
  • Pornography
  • Relational Models Theory
  • Sexual Economics Theory
  • Terror Management Theory
  • Affect Heuristic
  • Affect Infusion
  • Affect-as-Information
  • Ambivalence
  • Broaden-and-Build Theory of Positive Affect
  • Buffering Effect
  • Companionate Love
  • Decision and Commitment in Love
  • Embarrassment
  • Emotional Contagion
  • Emotional Intelligence
  • Facial Expression of Emotion
  • Facial-Feedback Hypothesis
  • Fear Appeals
  • Forgiveness
  • Hedonic Treadmill
  • Independence of Positive and Negative Affect
  • Intergroup Anxiety
  • Intergroup Emotions
  • Mere Exposure Effect
  • Moral Emotions
  • Nonconscious Emotion
  • Opponent Process Theory of Emotions
  • Positive Affect
  • Romantic Love
  • Social Anxiety
  • Stress and Coping
  • Unrequited Love
  • Visceral Influences
  • Affordances
  • Dominance, Evolutionary
  • Ecological Rationality
  • Error Management Theory
  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Fight-or-Flight Response
  • Genetic Influences on Social Behavior
  • Kin Selection
  • Sexual Selection
  • Sexual Strategies Theory
  • Sociobiological Theory
  • Sociobiology
  • Brainstorming
  • Bystander Effect
  • Close Relationships
  • Cohesiveness, Group
  • Communal Relationships
  • Contact Hypothesis
  • Contingency Model of Leadership
  • Deindividuation
  • Diffusion of Responsibility
  • Discontinuity Effect
  • Distributive Justice
  • Entitativity
  • Group Cohesiveness
  • Group Decision Making
  • Group Dynamics
  • Group Identity
  • Group Performance and Group Productivity
  • Group Polarization
  • Groups, Characteristics of
  • Ingroup-Outgroup Bias
  • Intergroup Relations
  • Jigsaw Classroom
  • Minimal Group Paradigm
  • Minority Social Influence
  • Optimal Distinctiveness Theory
  • Organizational Behavior
  • Other–Total Ratio
  • Outgroup Homogeneity
  • Procedural Justice
  • Realistic Group Conflict Theory
  • Ringelmann Effect
  • Risky Shift
  • Robbers Cave Experiment
  • Roles and Role Theory
  • Rumor Transmission
  • Scapegoat Theory
  • Self-Categorization Theory
  • Self-Stereotyping
  • Social Compensation
  • Social Dominance Orientation
  • Social Identity Theory
  • Social Impact Theory
  • Social Justice Orientation
  • Social Power
  • Socioeconomic Status
  • System Justification
  • Territoriality
  • Token Effects
  • Binge Eating
  • Biopsychosocial Model
  • Health Psychology
  • Sexual Desire
  • Social Neuroscience
  • Social Psychophysiology
  • Tend-and-Befriend Response
  • Testosterone
  • Bennington College Study
  • History of Social Psychology
  • Logical Positivism
  • Reductionism
  • Thematic Apperception Test
  • Door-in-the-Face Technique
  • Foot-in-the-Door Technique
  • Forced Compliance
  • Informational Influence
  • Ingratiation
  • Ingratiator's Dilemma
  • Inoculation Theory
  • Normative Influence
  • Norms, Prescriptive and Descriptive
  • Reciprocity Norm
  • Reference Group
  • Resisting Persuasion
  • Scarcity Principle
  • Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
  • Sleeper Effect
  • Stealing Thunder
  • Supplication
  • Attachment Theory
  • Complementarity, of Relationship Partners
  • Dependence Regulation
  • Empathic Accuracy
  • Equity Theory
  • Exchange Relationships
  • Interdependence Theory
  • Interpersonal Cognition
  • Marital Satisfaction
  • Matching Hypothesis
  • Need to Belong
  • Nonverbal Cues and Communication
  • Propinquity
  • Romantic Secrecy
  • Self-Disclosure
  • Self-Evaluation Maintenance
  • Self-Expansion Theory
  • Similarity-Attraction Effect
  • Social Exchange Theory
  • Social Support
  • Social Value Orientation
  • Transactive Memory
  • Triangular Theory of Love
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Fast and Frugal Heuristics
  • Hindsight Bias
  • Hot Hand Effect
  • Hyperbolic Discounting
  • Illusion of Transparency
  • Illusory Correlation
  • Integrative Complexity
  • Law of Small Numbers
  • Loss Aversion
  • Mental Accounting
  • Mere Ownership Effect
  • Naive Cynicism
  • Naive Realism
  • Omission Neglect
  • Overconfidence
  • Planning Fallacy
  • Pluralistic Ignorance
  • Preference Reversals
  • Prisoner's Dilemma
  • Prospect Theory
  • Public Goods Dilemma
  • Recency Effect
  • Representativeness Heuristic
  • Sequential Choice
  • Simulation Heuristic
  • Simultaneous Choice
  • Social Dilemmas
  • Spreading of Alternatives
  • Autobiographical Narratives
  • Big Five Personality Traits
  • Bogus Pipeline
  • Content Analysis
  • Control Condition
  • Critical Social Psychology
  • Cross-Lagged Panel Correlation
  • Deception (Methodological Technique)
  • Demand Characteristics
  • Discursive Psychology
  • Dynamical Systems Theory
  • Ecological Validity
  • Experimental Condition
  • Experimental Realism
  • Experimentation
  • Experimenter Effects
  • Falsification
  • Identity Status
  • Implicit Association Test
  • Individual Differences
  • Lost Letter Technique
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Mundane Realism
  • Nonexperimental Designs
  • Operationalization
  • Order Effects
  • Path Analysis
  • Placebo Effect
  • Quasi-Experimental Designs
  • Research Methods
  • Self-Reports
  • Semantic Differential
  • Social Relations Model
  • Sociometric Status
  • Structural Equation Modeling
  • Twin Studies
  • Achievement Motivation
  • Agreeableness
  • Attachment Styles
  • Authoritarian Personality
  • Babyfaceness
  • Central Traits Versus Peripheral Traits
  • Control Motivation
  • Defensive Pessimism
  • Extraversion
  • Gender Differences
  • Implicit Personality Theory
  • Introversion
  • Masculinity/Femininity
  • Narcissistic Entitlement
  • Need for Affiliation
  • Need for Closure
  • Need for Cognition
  • Need for Power
  • Neuroticism
  • Personalities and Behavior Patterns, Type A and Type B
  • Personality and Social Behavior
  • Power Motive
  • Rejection Sensitivity
  • Self-Complexity
  • Self-Concept Clarity
  • Self-Esteem
  • Self-Esteem Stability
  • Self-Monitoring
  • Sensation Seeking
  • Benevolent Sexism
  • Discrimination
  • Prejudice Reduction
  • Stereotypes and Stereotyping
  • Symbolic Racism
  • Counterregulation of Eating
  • Altruistic Punishment
  • Cooperation
  • Decision Model of Helping
  • Empathy–Altruism Hypothesis
  • Helping Behavior
  • Negative-State Relief Model
  • Positive Psychology
  • Prosocial Behavior
  • Reciprocal Altruism
  • Religion and Spirituality
  • Search for Meaning in Life
  • Volunteerism
  • Actor–Observer Asymmetries
  • Barnum Effect
  • Basking in Reflected Glory (BIRGing)
  • Contingencies of Self-Worth
  • Downward Social Comparison
  • Egocentric Bias
  • Escape Theory
  • Executive Function of Self
  • Exemplification
  • Identity Crisis
  • Illusion of Control
  • Introspection
  • Looking-Glass Self
  • Misattribution of Arousal
  • Name Letter Effect
  • Personal Space
  • Positive Illusions
  • Psychological Entitlement
  • Self-Affirmation Theory
  • Self-Attribution Process
  • Self-Concept
  • Self-Deception
  • Self-Enhancement
  • Self-Reference Effect
  • Self-Serving Bias
  • Self-Verification Theory
  • Social Comparison
  • Spotlight Effect
  • Symbolic Self-Completion
  • Value Priorities
  • Accessibility
  • Accountability
  • Alcohol Myopia Effect
  • Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic
  • Assimilation Processes
  • Associative Networks
  • Attribution Theory
  • Attributional Ambiguity
  • Attributions
  • Automatic Processes
  • Availability Heuristic
  • Bad Is Stronger Than Good
  • Base Rate Fallacy
  • Belief Perseverance
  • Blaming the Victim
  • Confirmation Bias
  • Consciousness
  • Contrast Effects
  • Correspondence Bias
  • Correspondent Inference Theory
  • Counterfactual Thinking
  • Defensive Attribution
  • Depressive Realism
  • Diagnosticity
  • Dilution Effect
  • Discounting, in Attribution
  • Distinctiveness, in Attribution
  • Dual Process Theories
  • Expectancy Effects
  • Expectations
  • Eyewitness Testimony, Accuracy of
  • False Consciousness
  • False Consensus Effect
  • False Uniqueness Bias
  • Fundamental Attribution Error
  • Gain–Loss Framing
  • Gambler's Fallacy
  • Halo Effect
  • Heuristic Processing
  • Hostile Attribution Bias
  • Hostile Media Bias
  • Just-World Hypothesis
  • Justice Motive
  • Kelley's Covariation Model
  • Lay Epistemics
  • Meaning Maintenance Model
  • Metacognition
  • Mind-Wandering
  • Moral Reasoning
  • Motivated Cognition
  • Person Perception
  • Person-Positivity Heuristic
  • Personality Judgments, Accuracy of
  • Positive–Negative Asymmetry
  • Primacy Effect, Attribution
  • Primacy Effect, Memory
  • Responsibility Attribution
  • Risk Appraisal
  • Shifting Standards
  • Social Categorization
  • Social Cognition
  • Social Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Projection
  • Spontaneous Trait Inferences
  • Subliminal Perception
  • Symbolic Interactionism
  • Theory of Mind
  • Thin Slices of Behavior
  • Three-Dimensional Model of Attribution
  • Value Pluralism Model
  • Applied Social Psychology
  • Consumer Behavior
  • Environmental Psychology
  • Forensic Psychology
  • Peace Psychology
  • Political Psychology
  • Sociological Social Psychology

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day free trial, more like this, sage recommends.

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches

  • Sign in/register

Navigating away from this page will delete your results

Please save your results to "My Self-Assessments" in your profile before navigating away from this page.

Sign in to my profile

Please sign into your institution before accessing your profile

Sign up for a free trial and experience all Sage Learning Resources have to offer.

You must have a valid academic email address to sign up.

Get off-campus access

  • View or download all content my institution has access to.

Sign up for a free trial and experience all Sage Learning Resources has to offer.

  • view my profile
  • view my lists